From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881F1C10F1E for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233326AbiLTJUu (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2022 04:20:50 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34416 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233115AbiLTJUm (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2022 04:20:42 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A225ACE9 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 01:20:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id 124so8134516pfy.0 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 01:20:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heitbaum.com; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u0kUVeZvZDV2Kx8BbblSmig5GTII1WAhwsA2y6hEzi8=; b=ZVTPWKsXd1fzOA2wA22mD9Rt4Ju6SJK/sY2lgW28dsjZToWoKY0HgpHD81zIQPgDbg ax946E9pCm3lteOui4VJgyAD5UsRNg4YJfNKatOL4oiWTY8sSZmMAwp2ybbmJtzHqe6p zGedDflXJctQU/CijWcQtCZXuLss78Z1h5gbc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=u0kUVeZvZDV2Kx8BbblSmig5GTII1WAhwsA2y6hEzi8=; b=sfzgzwXZ9XsG21kr9HEgFijEUbIHs4/nN3uPYi8eqwqatXHo7sNxYybLYxlz3egkkn tjdunUTSc2L1kzDBrZRgMRB0xizsaU64ZOeOf6J4T+ngHwPfGDjfTAazJumXDRzYWZKO /SKDv2Sx4Py3AGJyUowgpez3KcMgzlCosl54EtYGyF4KSJV0t7gEvQB61Stli/TY2NBu bQqri2Sei0P5KrrTpaiK2Hf0ZSaED/xJQHrqU6wZ3OHSZsVpNXkWYJ3Un6UtjPEzsuq/ vqvRbArI8bKqwNKqEtLV61klm9mesfiURoJ52qJMcQIRpNLtiH+EqxJvjB00fMfY/uui FEAA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plAL9/tig7daG87oVVEuMMZQYy/fO/D9K3IKjSp0GXS/BsE8/H3 T1HROSsMC/DheKrUVklDih1O4g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf49lj61k6YHOJb6LKCtzVpzarpMBrdoGW0/AkN8gST9ofl9jS8iP7p5fDZuCz57F2wvnaJkcA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8c04:0:b0:578:202d:a33e with SMTP id c4-20020aa78c04000000b00578202da33emr41586500pfd.20.1671528040886; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 01:20:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ec167f3768ca ([220.253.112.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d26-20020aa797ba000000b005745eb7eccasm8135211pfq.112.2022.12.20.01.20.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Dec 2022 01:20:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:20:33 +0000 From: Rudi Heitbaum To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review Message-ID: <20221220092032.GA955642@ec167f3768ca> References: <20221219182943.395169070@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221219182943.395169070@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release. > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Hi Greg, 6.1.1-rc1 tested. Run tested on: - Intel Alder Lake x86_64 (nuc12 i7-1260P) - SolidRun Cubox-i Dual/Quad - NXP iMX6 (Cubox-i4Pro) In addition - build tested for: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - Allwinner H6 - NXP iMX8 - Qualcomm Dragonboard - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro - Samsung Exynos Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum -- Rudi