From: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, bgardon@google.com,
dmatlack@google.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Subject: [Patch v3 7/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Allocate page table's pages on NUMA node of the underlying pages
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:34:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221222023457.1764-8-vipinsh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221222023457.1764-1-vipinsh@google.com>
Page table pages of a VM are currently allocated based on the current
task's NUMA node or its mempolicy. This can cause suboptimal remote
accesses by the vCPU if it is accessing physical pages local to its NUMA
node but the page table pages mapping those physcal pages were created
by some other vCPU which was on different NUMA node or had different
policy.
Allocate page table pages on the same NUMA node where underlying
physical page exists. Page table at level 5, 4, and 3 might not end up
on the same NUMA node as they can span multiple NUMA nodes.
Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 4 +--
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 11 +++---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 293994fabae3..b1f319ad6f89 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
struct kvm_mmu *walk_mmu;
struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache mmu_pte_list_desc_cache;
- struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache mmu_shadow_page_cache;
+ struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache mmu_shadow_page_cache[MAX_NUMNODES];
struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache mmu_shadowed_info_cache;
struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache mmu_page_header_cache;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 23a3b82b2384..511c6ef265ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -677,24 +677,29 @@ static int mmu_topup_sp_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
static int mmu_topup_memory_caches(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool maybe_indirect)
{
- int r;
+ int r, nid;
/* 1 rmap, 1 parent PTE per level, and the prefetched rmaps. */
r = kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache,
1 + PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL + PTE_PREFETCH_NUM);
if (r)
return r;
- r = mmu_topup_sp_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache,
- &vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache_lock,
- PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL);
- if (r)
- return r;
+
+ for_each_online_node(nid) {
+ r = mmu_topup_sp_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache[nid],
+ &vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache_lock,
+ PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL);
+ if (r)
+ return r;
+ }
+
if (maybe_indirect) {
r = kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadowed_info_cache,
PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL);
if (r)
return r;
}
+
return kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache,
PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL);
}
@@ -715,9 +720,14 @@ static void mmu_free_sp_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
static void mmu_free_memory_caches(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
+ int nid;
+
kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache);
- mmu_free_sp_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache,
- &vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache_lock);
+
+ for_each_node(nid)
+ mmu_free_sp_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache[nid],
+ &vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache_lock);
+
kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadowed_info_cache);
kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache);
}
@@ -2256,11 +2266,12 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *__kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
gfn_t gfn,
- union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
+ union kvm_mmu_page_role role,
+ int nid)
{
struct shadow_page_caches caches = {
.page_header_cache = &vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache,
- .shadow_page_cache = &vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache,
+ .shadow_page_cache = &vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache[nid],
.shadowed_info_cache = &vcpu->arch.mmu_shadowed_info_cache,
.shadow_page_cache_lock = &vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache_lock
};
@@ -2316,15 +2327,19 @@ static union kvm_mmu_page_role kvm_mmu_child_role(u64 *sptep, bool direct,
static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
u64 *sptep, gfn_t gfn,
- bool direct, unsigned int access)
+ bool direct, unsigned int access,
+ kvm_pfn_t pfn)
{
union kvm_mmu_page_role role;
+ int nid;
if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && !is_large_pte(*sptep))
return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
role = kvm_mmu_child_role(sptep, direct, access);
- return kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu, gfn, role);
+ nid = kvm_pfn_to_page_table_nid(pfn);
+
+ return kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu, gfn, role, nid);
}
static void shadow_walk_init_using_root(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator,
@@ -3208,7 +3223,8 @@ static int direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
if (it.level == fault->goal_level)
break;
- sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, base_gfn, true, ACC_ALL);
+ sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, base_gfn, true,
+ ACC_ALL, fault->pfn);
if (sp == ERR_PTR(-EEXIST))
continue;
@@ -3636,7 +3652,7 @@ static hpa_t mmu_alloc_root(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, int quadrant,
WARN_ON_ONCE(quadrant && !role.has_4_byte_gpte);
WARN_ON_ONCE(role.direct && role.has_4_byte_gpte);
- sp = kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu, gfn, role);
+ sp = kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu, gfn, role, numa_mem_id());
++sp->root_count;
return __pa(sp->spt);
@@ -5952,7 +5968,7 @@ static int __kvm_mmu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu)
int kvm_mmu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret, nid;
INIT_KVM_MMU_MEMORY_CACHE(&vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache,
pte_list_desc_cache, NUMA_NO_NODE);
@@ -5960,8 +5976,9 @@ int kvm_mmu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
INIT_KVM_MMU_MEMORY_CACHE(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache,
mmu_page_header_cache, NUMA_NO_NODE);
- INIT_KVM_MMU_MEMORY_CACHE(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache,
- NULL, NUMA_NO_NODE);
+ for_each_node(nid)
+ INIT_KVM_MMU_MEMORY_CACHE(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache[nid],
+ NULL, nid);
spin_lock_init(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache_lock);
vcpu->arch.mmu = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
@@ -6692,13 +6709,17 @@ void kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gen)
}
static unsigned long mmu_shrink_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
+ int cache_count,
spinlock_t *cache_lock)
{
unsigned long freed = 0;
+ int nid;
spin_lock(cache_lock);
- if (cache->nobjs)
- freed = kvm_mmu_empty_memory_cache(cache);
+ for (nid = 0; nid < cache_count; nid++) {
+ if (node_online(nid) && cache[nid].nobjs)
+ freed += kvm_mmu_empty_memory_cache(&cache[nid]);
+ }
spin_unlock(cache_lock);
return freed;
}
@@ -6721,13 +6742,15 @@ mmu_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
list_move_tail(&kvm->vm_list, &vm_list);
freed += mmu_shrink_cache(&kvm->arch.split_shadow_page_cache,
+ 1,
&kvm->arch.split_shadow_page_cache_lock);
if (freed >= sc->nr_to_scan)
break;
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
- freed += mmu_shrink_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache,
+ freed += mmu_shrink_cache(vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache,
+ MAX_NUMNODES,
&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache_lock);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
index e5662dbd519c..1ceca62ec4cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
table_gfn = gw->table_gfn[it.level - 2];
access = gw->pt_access[it.level - 2];
sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, table_gfn,
- false, access);
+ false, access, fault->pfn);
if (sp != ERR_PTR(-EEXIST)) {
/*
@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
validate_direct_spte(vcpu, it.sptep, direct_access);
sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, base_gfn,
- true, direct_access);
+ true, direct_access, fault->pfn);
if (sp == ERR_PTR(-EEXIST))
continue;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 376b8dceb3f9..b5abae2366dd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -259,12 +259,12 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
kvm_mmu_page_as_id(_root) != _as_id) { \
} else
-static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int nid)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
sp = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache);
- sp->spt = kvm_mmu_sp_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache,
+ sp->spt = kvm_mmu_sp_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache[nid],
&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache_lock);
return sp;
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ hpa_t kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto out;
}
- root = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(vcpu);
+ root = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(vcpu, numa_mem_id());
tdp_mmu_init_sp(root, NULL, 0, role);
refcount_set(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count, 1);
@@ -1149,7 +1149,7 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
struct tdp_iter iter;
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
- int ret = RET_PF_RETRY;
+ int ret = RET_PF_RETRY, nid;
kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust(vcpu, fault);
@@ -1178,11 +1178,12 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
!is_large_pte(iter.old_spte))
continue;
+ nid = kvm_pfn_to_page_table_nid(fault->pfn);
/*
* The SPTE is either non-present or points to a huge page that
* needs to be split.
*/
- sp = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(vcpu);
+ sp = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(vcpu, nid);
tdp_mmu_init_child_sp(sp, &iter);
sp->nx_huge_page_disallowed = fault->huge_page_disallowed;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index d96c8146e9ba..4f3db7ffeba8 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static inline void *mmu_memory_cache_alloc_obj(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc,
if (mc->kmem_cache)
return kmem_cache_alloc(mc->kmem_cache, gfp_flags);
else
- return (void *)__get_free_page(gfp_flags);
+ return kvm_mmu_get_free_page(mc->node, gfp_flags);
}
int __kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc, int capacity, int min)
--
2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-22 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-22 2:34 [Patch v3 0/9] NUMA aware page table's pages allocation Vipin Sharma
2022-12-22 2:34 ` [Patch v3 1/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Repurpose KVM MMU shrinker to purge shadow page caches Vipin Sharma
2022-12-27 18:37 ` Ben Gardon
2022-12-28 22:07 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-12-29 21:15 ` David Matlack
2023-01-03 17:38 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-12-29 21:54 ` David Matlack
2023-01-03 18:01 ` Vipin Sharma
2023-01-04 0:25 ` Vipin Sharma
2023-01-18 17:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-03 19:32 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-01-04 1:00 ` Vipin Sharma
2023-01-04 6:29 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-01-04 6:57 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-01-18 17:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-16 4:14 ` kernel test robot
2022-12-22 2:34 ` [Patch v3 2/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove zapped_obsolete_pages from struct kvm_arch{} Vipin Sharma
2022-12-29 21:59 ` David Matlack
2022-12-22 2:34 ` [Patch v3 3/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Shrink split_shadow_page_cache via KVM MMU shrinker Vipin Sharma
2022-12-22 2:34 ` [Patch v3 4/9] KVM: Add module param to make page tables NUMA aware Vipin Sharma
2022-12-29 22:05 ` David Matlack
2022-12-22 2:34 ` [Patch v3 5/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Allocate TDP page table's page on correct NUMA node on split Vipin Sharma
2022-12-27 19:02 ` Ben Gardon
2022-12-28 22:07 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-12-29 22:30 ` David Matlack
2023-01-03 18:26 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-12-22 2:34 ` [Patch v3 6/9] KVM: Provide NUMA node support to kvm_mmu_memory_cache{} Vipin Sharma
2022-12-27 19:09 ` Ben Gardon
2022-12-28 22:07 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-12-29 18:22 ` Ben Gardon
2023-01-03 17:36 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-12-29 23:08 ` David Matlack
2022-12-29 23:11 ` David Matlack
2023-01-03 18:45 ` Vipin Sharma
2023-01-03 18:55 ` David Matlack
2022-12-22 2:34 ` Vipin Sharma [this message]
2022-12-27 19:34 ` [Patch v3 7/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Allocate page table's pages on NUMA node of the underlying pages Ben Gardon
2022-12-28 22:08 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-12-29 18:20 ` Ben Gardon
2022-12-22 2:34 ` [Patch v3 8/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Make split_shadow_page_cache NUMA aware Vipin Sharma
2022-12-27 19:42 ` Ben Gardon
2022-12-28 22:08 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-12-29 23:18 ` David Matlack
2023-01-03 18:49 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-12-22 2:34 ` [Patch v3 9/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Reduce default cache size in KVM from 40 to PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL Vipin Sharma
2022-12-27 19:52 ` Ben Gardon
2022-12-28 22:08 ` Vipin Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221222023457.1764-8-vipinsh@google.com \
--to=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®