From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D168EC4708D for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 16:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235115AbiL1Qx2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:53:28 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45808 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235148AbiL1Qwo (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:52:44 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD1771DDF1 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:47:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id t2so16530548ply.2 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:47:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=20heIbwArwzJZx617fL3Bywm94hV8d0YJO2Vs/U/I44=; b=FZsMOHQJQn/nyu2ewUl+t3Z16WbE4SFe8elYLjjLQUYE3T3MO+x6Y34R1OpxRptkOW 23GPjz3fyivGHaZjAkNThOZcrpYnKCZtxow802YIyreKKne+/YzzQEdoNEXaOPvNfC53 3WbnHBE3UO+WpeXILK1gyhIM4ONIw5yVksc1ANfya95Bw6Hisuugcv5T/sX7YU0yYzBG JK65qajqiW1yXt5g85RwfQx8qSBzXfXmmwM7wobyb+lvUEpTZkXVnQ2F3CuGxRGyMf5e LUHMvP5nWZfT37zPRGChdfSq5pyvY1MdNhCJwU8SY+2PRYwS0TxJLL7aNGKfjL6bkWsf uEsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=20heIbwArwzJZx617fL3Bywm94hV8d0YJO2Vs/U/I44=; b=bAMhXjQo10qrYyFsppIwppQeDvtnR50YI4jZQCiWqc2Jp9Z4fz9GwfsWHunwzh+egs Q6OdV8ONiEuyJlHhLalq6aIBJyLyWXU+Az36ZvXvJGzkAt205K3hq400hcozIxhfsy00 9KyztGHmplMa2XqvkS5ZQduEED/PiaRwg4BUwzJ1sEXpWuVPCNl7hZHw39966CTxtUNa Pht4SXkkm4kSu9dKOkf8zDfpiGw7bj0mon5+OLCRzw6VFGAzROUXbfss/TjZFFGnukyr Lh+MMytYGmrgjCidyp/R7bRndL0D3fg7rkZTkPug6VbpbZkY1Z2/aSF3WK5I5X/ipBvI PzAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kr8qTvJrSMz7ucWDUCF0dTC1GEBB4RvIRF2rOu3ABeD09htma0b p8vyBLBjYhNXd4/DJk+SpXbl X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtFKZAfe8GZaSjUc16vjEtsrMue4bvQYgI7FCpW2FFQe2IDhQPxlL7lS/FSgLrjpptRy+vvSg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ed0b:b0:192:7b0b:9c06 with SMTP id b11-20020a170902ed0b00b001927b0b9c06mr9754198pld.8.1672246044274; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:47:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from thinkpad ([117.217.178.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s6-20020a170902ea0600b001913c5fc051sm11283591plg.274.2022.12.28.08.47.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:47:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 22:17:11 +0530 From: Manivannan Sadhasivam To: Borislav Petkov Cc: andersson@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, tony.luck@intel.com, quic_saipraka@quicinc.com, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, mchehab@kernel.org, rric@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, quic_ppareek@quicinc.com, luca.weiss@fairphone.com, ahalaney@redhat.com, steev@kali.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/17] Qcom: LLCC/EDAC: Fix base address used for LLCC banks Message-ID: <20221228164711.GB256211@thinkpad> References: <20221228084028.46528-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 11:36:06AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 02:10:11PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > Patches 1/17, 2/17 and 3/17 can be merged independently to EDAC tree. Rest of > > the patches should be merged to qcom tree due to LLCC dependency. > > Why make it more complicated than it has to be? > > How about I review the EDAC bits and once they look ok, whoever takes > care of the qcom tree can pick them up too and route the whole pile > through there? > Well, some maintainers prefer to pick the independent patches through their tree. That's why I moved those patches to the start of the series. > This way there's no needless dependency between trees... > If you are fine with all patches going through qcom tree, I do not have any issue :) Thanks, Mani > Hmm. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்