From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E97DC4332F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2022 05:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230017AbiLaFwL (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Dec 2022 00:52:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54340 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229527AbiLaFwH (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Dec 2022 00:52:07 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x235.google.com (mail-oi1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::235]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43C5F13E8D; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 21:52:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x235.google.com with SMTP id r11so20867036oie.13; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 21:52:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=NVipoNjby+BOws8FLX/AuDw7QSwId0oY3eFy8ssadWI=; b=Eodyx5tiVTgtD0iNxx8DYyUGkHEntoWu1TG1qrjaBUm+kuFF6/s1zfxpkLRP55sGyH zeJjGoc50wi67Sp2edBB8Xhg9xIpZ5eEoFJonjGY+xKFFspl+/gpAtQRpo6i2J4xUr1y BeOlGKbCn6t4NkYEGcI/LiticrnM7TYHvUSax5K2vBL8CUs8LeeH1oD4SCeio5XRYiqX cFE2i0u7O1d2dH1PRfv2/bw8Jv5vPWD8Pb+XslWZtpFHQgghZ8pegJYbxvjJrXZPf+ke L9AkfbxYZWnn2fbd4rOvrstKGDEe4psvGw6CTyIAg39rszhNRyNvBHoMbHj6xyvCL4P4 ulqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NVipoNjby+BOws8FLX/AuDw7QSwId0oY3eFy8ssadWI=; b=yfjd3vk4bJu9Y2TUGo/DPs7RBjmaY/ozbuy6fhkihOZn3i2t6/NJ6FSLJT9WPw2KpG qwJ6WaMLpVaA+B7oeKf3oUG8xuF5qtmGGjDA5ccap+GMGXV9PaBDQdikAANkXk7IgcId WsxjmeQSlfgcgGV3ZFt8xQfFkEGvLNnCL3ae4f8if+4tz8iziJ2jqpHfz+GnREaDoxMb 39aI4U2PTkExkqhn9SAOZACJYjCqCjf8z7p4JwCpQtHo1XtG1l/7uzJVT92FPsa2/dUJ at54eaxi/4TPDAFfyBrp4+PEbafkhKX6nHqoLDybYne3PbMNzPz/g9OT7FcZVEPXQtZh O7Xg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kpLyS6yOJ0jovnrbjpc04a2SrxI/yAT4hDBF5Q7hMUjcL0MZMJ4 +BDVP4nYzGfajKb/LJ6NW64= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtyY8bch1tU7KCYxUTZMycyXm3sZrdzNi/A9dT2d64rPBgLOwCeg3fUd5Ot7Wr6FfCcnQjRgw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:208e:b0:360:d179:97b4 with SMTP id s14-20020a056808208e00b00360d17997b4mr19372178oiw.35.1672465925515; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 21:52:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j9-20020a056808056900b0034d9042758fsm9883340oig.24.2022.12.30.21.52.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 30 Dec 2022 21:52:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 21:52:03 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Conor Dooley Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 0000/1066] 6.0.16-rc2 review Message-ID: <20221231055203.GA2926213@roeck-us.net> References: <20221230094059.698032393@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 12:09:13AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > Hey Greg, > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 10:49:23AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.16 release. > > There are 1066 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 01 Jan 2023 09:38:41 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > Paulo Alcantara > > cifs: improve symlink handling for smb2+ > > This patch here appears to fail allmodconfig + LLVM on RISC-V: > ../fs/cifs/smb2inode.c:419:4: error: variable 'idata' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized] > idata->symlink_target = kstrdup(cfile->symlink_target, GFP_KERNEL); > ^~~~~ > ../fs/cifs/smb2inode.c:76:35: note: initialize the variable 'idata' to silence this warning > struct cifs_open_info_data *idata; > ^ > = NULL > 1 error generated. Fixed with upstream commit 69ccafdd35cdf ("cifs: fix uninitialised var in smb2_compound_op()"). Guenter > > It looks like this was reported as a smatch error on Christmas Day: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/202212250020.fyWQFNzF-lkp@intel.com/ > > Given the day in question, missing that report seems pretty > understandable :) > > I tried to see if this had been reported already against the patches > themselves, rather than Sasha's queue, but given the size of the patchset > I may have missed it. Apologies for the noise if I have. > > Thanks, > Conor. >