From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: X86-kernel <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/microcode/intel: Print old and new rev during early boot
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 10:02:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230103180212.333496-6-ashok.raj@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230103180212.333496-1-ashok.raj@intel.com>
Make early loading message to match late loading messages. Print
both old and new revisions.
This is helpful to know what the BIOS loaded revision is before an early
update.
New dmesg log is shown below.
microcode: early update: 0x2b000041 -> 0x2b000070 date = 2000-01-01
Cache the early BIOS revision before the microcode update and change the
print_ucode_info() so it prints both the old and new revision in the same
format as microcode_reload_late().
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
Updates since previous post.
Thomas: Commit log updates as suggested.
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 1d709b72cfd0..f24300830ed7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -310,10 +310,10 @@ static bool load_builtin_intel_microcode(struct cpio_data *cp)
/*
* Print ucode update info.
*/
-static void print_ucode_info(unsigned int new_rev, unsigned int date)
+static void print_ucode_info(int old_rev, int new_rev, unsigned int date)
{
- pr_info_once("microcode updated early to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
- new_rev, date & 0xffff, date >> 24,
+ pr_info_once("early update: 0x%x -> 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
+ old_rev, new_rev, date & 0xffff, date >> 24,
(date >> 16) & 0xff);
}
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ static void print_ucode_info(unsigned int new_rev, unsigned int date)
static int delay_ucode_info;
static int current_mc_date;
+static int early_old_rev;
/*
* Print early updated ucode info after printk works. This is delayed info dump.
@@ -331,7 +332,7 @@ void show_ucode_info_early(void)
if (delay_ucode_info) {
intel_cpu_collect_info(&uci);
- print_ucode_info(uci.cpu_sig.rev. current_mc_date);
+ print_ucode_info(early_old_rev, uci.cpu_sig.rev, current_mc_date);
delay_ucode_info = 0;
}
}
@@ -340,30 +341,33 @@ void show_ucode_info_early(void)
* At this point, we can not call printk() yet. Delay printing microcode info in
* show_ucode_info_early() until printk() works.
*/
-static void print_ucode(int new_rev, int date)
+static void print_ucode(int old_rev, int new_rev, int date)
{
struct microcode_intel *mc;
int *delay_ucode_info_p;
int *current_mc_date_p;
+ int *early_old_rev_p;
delay_ucode_info_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(&delay_ucode_info);
current_mc_date_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(¤t_mc_date);
+ early_old_rev_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(&early_old_rev);
*delay_ucode_info_p = 1;
*current_mc_date_p = date;
+ *early_old_rev_p = old_rev;
}
#else
-static inline void print_ucode(int new_rev, int date)
+static inline void print_ucode(int old_rev, int new_rev, int date)
{
- print_ucode_info(new_rev, date);
+ print_ucode_info(old_rev, new_rev, date);
}
#endif
static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
{
struct microcode_intel *mc;
- u32 rev;
+ u32 rev, old_rev;
mc = uci->mc;
if (!mc)
@@ -389,6 +393,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
+ old_rev = rev;
rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
if (rev != mc->hdr.rev)
return -1;
@@ -396,9 +401,9 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
if (early)
- print_ucode(uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc->hdr.date);
+ print_ucode(old_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc->hdr.date);
else
- print_ucode_info(uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc->hdr.date);
+ print_ucode_info(old_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc->hdr.date);
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-03 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-03 18:02 [PATCH v3 0/6] Some fixes and cleanups for microcode Ashok Raj
2023-01-03 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] x86/microcode: Add a parameter to microcode_check() to store CPU capabilities Ashok Raj
2023-01-04 18:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-03 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] x86/microcode/core: Take a snapshot before and after applying microcode Ashok Raj
2023-01-03 18:46 ` Dave Hansen
2023-01-03 19:37 ` Ashok Raj
2023-01-04 18:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-06 20:41 ` Ashok Raj
2023-01-03 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/microcode: Display revisions only when update is successful Ashok Raj
2023-01-04 19:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-06 19:42 ` Ashok Raj
2023-01-06 19:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-06 20:29 ` Ashok Raj
2023-01-06 20:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-06 21:20 ` Ashok Raj
2023-01-07 9:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-01-06 21:35 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-06 21:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-03 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] x86/microcode/intel: Use a plain revision argument for print_ucode_rev() Ashok Raj
2023-01-03 18:02 ` Ashok Raj [this message]
2023-01-03 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] x86/microcode/intel: Print when early microcode loading fails Ashok Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230103180212.333496-6-ashok.raj@intel.com \
--to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®