From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
To: brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com
Cc: rmoar@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kunit: kunit_skip() should not overwrite KUNIT_FAIL()
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:07:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230113220718.2901010-1-dlatypov@google.com> (raw)
Currently, kunit_skip() and kunit_mark_skipped() will overwrite the
current test's status even if it was already marked FAILED.
E.g. a test that just contains this
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "FAIL REASON");
kunit_skip(test, "SKIP REASON");
will be marked "SKIPPED" in the end.
Now, tests like the above don't and shouldn't exist.
But what happens if non-test code (e.g. KASAN) calls kunit_fail_current_test()?
E.g. if we have
if (do_some_invalid_memory_accesses())
kunit_skip(");
then the KASAN failures will get masked!
This patch: make it so kunit_mark_skipped() does not modify the status
if it's already set to something (either already to SKIPPED or FAILURE).
Before this change, the KTAP output would look like
# example_simple_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:23
FAIL REASON
ok 1 example_simple_test # SKIP SKIP REASON
After this change:
# example_simple_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:23
FAIL REASON
# example_simple_test: status already changed, not marking skipped: SKIP REASON
not ok 1 example_simple_test
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
---
include/kunit/test.h | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index 87ea90576b50..39936463dde5 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -386,11 +386,18 @@ void __printf(2, 3) kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...);
*
* Marks the test as skipped. @fmt is given output as the test status
* comment, typically the reason the test was skipped.
+ * This has no effect if the test has already been marked skipped or failed.
*
* Test execution continues after kunit_mark_skipped() is called.
*/
#define kunit_mark_skipped(test_or_suite, fmt, ...) \
do { \
+ if (READ_ONCE((test_or_suite)->status) != KUNIT_SUCCESS) {\
+ kunit_warn(test_or_suite, "status already " \
+ "changed, not marking skipped: " fmt,\
+ ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ break; \
+ } \
WRITE_ONCE((test_or_suite)->status, KUNIT_SKIPPED); \
scnprintf((test_or_suite)->status_comment, \
KUNIT_STATUS_COMMENT_SIZE, \
base-commit: 7dd4b804e08041ff56c88bdd8da742d14b17ed25
--
2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-13 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-13 22:07 Daniel Latypov [this message]
2023-01-14 5:51 ` David Gow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230113220718.2901010-1-dlatypov@google.com \
--to=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmoar@google.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®