[PATCH][next] btrfs: Fix spelling mistake "geneartion" -> "generation"

[Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>]

There is a spelling mistake in a btrfs warning message and in a comment.
Fix them both.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/scrub.c        | 2 +-
 fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index 10c26bc8e60e..a5d026041be4 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ static int scrub_checksum_tree_block(struct scrub_block *sblock)
 		sblock->header_error = 1;
 		sblock->generation_error = 1;
 		btrfs_warn_rl(fs_info,
-		"tree block %llu mirror %u has bad geneartion, has %llu want %llu",
+		"tree block %llu mirror %u has bad generation, has %llu want %llu",
 			      sblock->logical, sblock->mirror_num,
 			      btrfs_stack_header_generation(h),
 			      sector->generation);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index baad1ed7e111..32cd06f7660e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ static int check_root_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key,
 	/*
 	 * For legacy root item, the members starting at generation_v2 will be
 	 * all filled with 0.
-	 * And since we allow geneartion_v2 as 0, it will still pass the check.
+	 * And since we allow generation_v2 as 0, it will still pass the check.
 	 */
 	read_extent_buffer(leaf, &ri, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, slot),
 			   btrfs_item_size(leaf, slot));
-- 
2.30.2