From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: x86@kernel.org, Joan Bruguera <joanbrugueram@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
"Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"Roger Pau Monne" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
mark.rutland@arm.com, "Andrew Cooper" <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Jörg Rödel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] x86/boot: Delay sev_verify_cbit() a bit
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 15:25:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230116143645.649204101@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230116142533.905102512@infradead.org>
Per the comment it is important to call sev_verify_cbit() before the
first RET instruction, this means we can delay calling this until more
of the CPU state is set up, specifically delay this until GS is
'sane' such that per-cpu variables work.
Fixes: e81dc127ef69 ("x86/callthunks: Add call patching for call depth tracking")
Reported-by: Joan Bruguera <joanbrugueram@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
@@ -185,19 +185,6 @@ SYM_CODE_START(secondary_startup_64)
addq phys_base(%rip), %rax
/*
- * For SEV guests: Verify that the C-bit is correct. A malicious
- * hypervisor could lie about the C-bit position to perform a ROP
- * attack on the guest by writing to the unencrypted stack and wait for
- * the next RET instruction.
- * %rsi carries pointer to realmode data and is callee-clobbered. Save
- * and restore it.
- */
- pushq %rsi
- movq %rax, %rdi
- call sev_verify_cbit
- popq %rsi
-
- /*
* Switch to new page-table
*
* For the boot CPU this switches to early_top_pgt which still has the
@@ -265,6 +252,19 @@ SYM_CODE_START(secondary_startup_64)
*/
movq initial_stack(%rip), %rsp
+ /*
+ * For SEV guests: Verify that the C-bit is correct. A malicious
+ * hypervisor could lie about the C-bit position to perform a ROP
+ * attack on the guest by writing to the unencrypted stack and wait for
+ * the next RET instruction.
+ * %rsi carries pointer to realmode data and is callee-clobbered. Save
+ * and restore it.
+ */
+ pushq %rsi
+ movq %rax, %rdi
+ call sev_verify_cbit
+ popq %rsi
+
/* Setup and Load IDT */
pushq %rsi
call early_setup_idt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-16 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-16 14:25 [PATCH v2 0/7] x86: retbleed=stuff fixes Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-16 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] x86/boot: Remove verify_cpu() from secondary_startup_64() Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-17 9:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-01-18 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-18 11:46 ` kirill.shutemov
2023-01-19 19:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2023-01-26 14:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-16 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-01-19 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] x86/boot: Delay sev_verify_cbit() a bit Borislav Petkov
2023-01-20 12:43 ` Jörg Rödel
2023-01-16 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] x86/power: De-paravirt restore_processor_state() Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-20 20:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-16 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] x86/power: Inline write_cr[04]() Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-20 20:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-16 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] x86/callthunk: No callthunk for restore_processor_state() Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-16 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] x86/power: Sprinkle some noinstr Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-17 9:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-01-17 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-17 11:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-01-16 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] PM / hibernate: Add minimal noinstr annotations Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-18 1:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] x86: retbleed=stuff fixes Joan Bruguera
2023-05-16 13:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230116143645.649204101@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joanbrugueram@gmail.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®