mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	yhs@meta.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] bpf: Disallow NULL PTR_TO_MEM for trusted kfuncs
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:51:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230120052101.sevhc4jybcm6onu2@apollo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230119235833.2948341-4-void@manifault.com>

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:28:28AM IST, David Vernet wrote:
> KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs currently have a subtle and insidious bug in
> validating pointers to scalars. Say that you have a kfunc like the
> following, which takes an array as the first argument:
>
> bool bpf_cpumask_empty(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
> {
> 	return cpumask_empty(cpumask);
> }
>
> ...
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_empty, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
> ...
>

This is known and expected.

> If a BPF program were to invoke the kfunc with a NULL argument, it would
> crash the kernel. The reason is that struct cpumask is defined as a
> bitmap, which is itself defined as an array, and is accessed as a memory
> address memory by bitmap operations. So when the verifier analyzes the
> register, it interprets it as a pointer to a scalar struct, which is an
> array of size 8. check_mem_reg() then sees that the register is NULL,
> and returns 0, and the kfunc crashes when it passes it down to the
> cpumask wrappers.
>
> To fix this, this patch adds a check for KF_ARG_PTR_TO_MEM which
> verifies that the register doesn't contain a NULL pointer if the kfunc
> is KF_TRUSTED_ARGS.
>
> This may or may not be desired behavior. Some kfuncs may want to
> allow callers to pass NULL-able pointers. An alternative would be adding
> a KF_NOT_NULL flag and leaving KF_TRUSTED_ARGS alone, though given that
> a kfunc is saying it wants to "trust" an argument, it seems reasonable
> to prevent NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 9fa101420046..28ccb92ebe65 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -9092,6 +9092,11 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
>  					i, btf_type_str(ref_t), ref_tname, PTR_ERR(resolve_ret));
>  				return -EINVAL;
>  			}
> +			if (is_kfunc_trusted_args(meta) && register_is_null(reg)) {
> +				verbose(env, "NULL pointer passed to trusted arg%d\n", i);
> +				return -EACCES;
> +			}
> +

Current patch looks like a stop gap solution. Just checking for register_is_null
is not enough, what about PTR_MAYBE_NULL? That can also be passed. Some
arguments can be both PTR_TO_BTF_ID and PTR_TO_MEM, so it will be bypassed in
the other case because this check is limited to KF_ARG_PTR_TO_MEM. It would
probably be better to disallow NULL by default and explicitly tag the argument
with __or_null to indicate that NULL is accepted. Seems like a much better
default to me.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-20  5:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-19 23:58 [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] Enable cpumasks to be used as kptrs David Vernet
2023-01-19 23:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] bpf: Enable annotating trusted nested pointers David Vernet
2023-01-20  1:14   ` kernel test robot
2023-01-20  2:27     ` David Vernet
2023-01-20  6:01   ` kernel test robot
2023-01-19 23:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/8] bpf: Allow trusted args to walk struct when checking BTF IDs David Vernet
2023-01-20  4:58   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-01-20  5:23     ` David Vernet
2023-01-20  5:40       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-20  5:56         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-01-20  6:14           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-20 14:56             ` David Vernet
2023-01-20 15:26               ` David Vernet
2023-01-20 16:17                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-19 23:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] bpf: Disallow NULL PTR_TO_MEM for trusted kfuncs David Vernet
2023-01-20  5:21   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2023-01-20  5:31     ` David Vernet
2023-01-20  5:44       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-19 23:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/8] bpf: Enable cpumasks to be queried and used as kptrs David Vernet
2023-01-20  2:36   ` kernel test robot
2023-01-20  3:39     ` David Vernet
2023-01-20  5:48   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-20  5:50     ` David Vernet
2023-01-20  5:52       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-20  6:22   ` kernel test robot
2023-01-19 23:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] selftests/bpf: Add nested trust selftests suite David Vernet
2023-01-20  5:51   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-20  5:56     ` David Vernet
2023-01-19 23:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/8] selftests/bpf: Add selftest suite for cpumask kfuncs David Vernet
2023-01-19 23:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/8] bpf/docs: Document cpumask kfuncs in a new file David Vernet
2023-01-20  5:59   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-20  6:01     ` David Vernet
2023-01-19 23:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/8] bpf/docs: Document how nested trusted fields may be defined David Vernet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230120052101.sevhc4jybcm6onu2@apollo \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=yhs@meta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®