mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: Boris Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Stefan Talpalaru <stefantalpalaru@yahoo.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zilstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: [Patch v5 1/5] x86/microcode: Add a parameter to microcode_check() to store CPU capabilities
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:19:19 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230120161923.118882-2-ashok.raj@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230120161923.118882-1-ashok.raj@intel.com>

Add a parameter to store CPU capabilities before performing a microcode
update so that the code later can compare CPU capabilities before and after
performing the update.

Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner (Intel) <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Stefan Talpalaru <stefantalpalaru@yahoo.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zilstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
---
Changes since V3

Boris:
- Fix commit log to drop "next patch".
- Add documentation to new parameter to microcode_check()
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h     |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c         | 21 +++++++++++++--------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 4e35c66edeb7..f256a4ddd25d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ bool xen_set_default_idle(void);
 #endif
 
 void __noreturn stop_this_cpu(void *dummy);
-void microcode_check(void);
+void microcode_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *prev_info);
 
 enum l1tf_mitigations {
 	L1TF_MITIGATION_OFF,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 9cfca3d7d0e2..0f5a173d0871 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -2297,30 +2297,35 @@ void cpu_init_secondary(void)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MICROCODE_LATE_LOADING
-/*
+/**
+ * microcode_check() - Check if any CPU capabilities changed after an update.
+ * @prev_info:	CPU capabilities stored before an update.
+ *
  * The microcode loader calls this upon late microcode load to recheck features,
  * only when microcode has been updated. Caller holds microcode_mutex and CPU
  * hotplug lock.
+ *
+ * Return: None
  */
-void microcode_check(void)
+void microcode_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *prev_info)
 {
-	struct cpuinfo_x86 info;
-
 	perf_check_microcode();
 
 	/* Reload CPUID max function as it might've changed. */
-	info.cpuid_level = cpuid_eax(0);
+	prev_info->cpuid_level = cpuid_eax(0);
 
 	/*
 	 * Copy all capability leafs to pick up the synthetic ones so that
 	 * memcmp() below doesn't fail on that. The ones coming from CPUID will
 	 * get overwritten in get_cpu_cap().
 	 */
-	memcpy(&info.x86_capability, &boot_cpu_data.x86_capability, sizeof(info.x86_capability));
+	memcpy(&prev_info->x86_capability, &boot_cpu_data.x86_capability,
+	       sizeof(prev_info->x86_capability));
 
-	get_cpu_cap(&info);
+	get_cpu_cap(prev_info);
 
-	if (!memcmp(&info.x86_capability, &boot_cpu_data.x86_capability, sizeof(info.x86_capability)))
+	if (!memcmp(&prev_info->x86_capability, &boot_cpu_data.x86_capability,
+		    sizeof(prev_info->x86_capability)))
 		return;
 
 	pr_warn("x86/CPU: CPU features have changed after loading microcode, but might not take effect.\n");
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
index c4cd7328177b..e39d83be794b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static int __reload_late(void *info)
 static int microcode_reload_late(void)
 {
 	int old = boot_cpu_data.microcode, ret;
+	struct cpuinfo_x86 prev_info;
 
 	pr_err("Attempting late microcode loading - it is dangerous and taints the kernel.\n");
 	pr_err("You should switch to early loading, if possible.\n");
@@ -448,7 +449,7 @@ static int microcode_reload_late(void)
 
 	ret = stop_machine_cpuslocked(__reload_late, NULL, cpu_online_mask);
 	if (ret == 0)
-		microcode_check();
+		microcode_check(&prev_info);
 
 	pr_info("Reload completed, microcode revision: 0x%x -> 0x%x\n",
 		old, boot_cpu_data.microcode);
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-20 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-20 16:19 [Patch v5 0/5] Some fixes and cleanups for microcode Ashok Raj
2023-01-20 16:19 ` Ashok Raj [this message]
2023-01-20 16:19 ` [Patch v5 2/5] x86/microcode/core: Take a snapshot before and after applying microcode Ashok Raj
2023-01-20 16:19 ` [Patch v5 3/5] x86/microcode: Display revisions only when update is successful Ashok Raj
2023-01-20 16:19 ` [Patch v5 4/5] x86/microcode/intel: Use a plain revision argument for print_ucode_rev() Ashok Raj
2023-01-21 14:54   ` [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Pass the microcode revision to print_ucode_info() directly tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2023-01-20 16:19 ` [Patch v5 5/5] x86/microcode/intel: Print old and new rev during early boot Ashok Raj
2023-01-21 14:54   ` [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Print old and new revision " tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230120161923.118882-2-ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=stefantalpalaru@yahoo.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®