From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: runtime: Simplify __rpm_get_callback()
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:05:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230124150558.GA1061961@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0j4m-=twN3oH-Q_MDHLi-VnktMhFcGbGbGCC-x+0TXM_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 03:45:50PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:37 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:18 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:20 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> > > <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 7:23 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Simplify __rpm_get_callback() slightly by returning as soon as the return
> > > > > value is known. No functional change intended.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 650bdddb6b311705 ("PM:
> > > > runtime: Simplify __rpm_get_callback()") in pm/linux-next.
> > > >
> > > > > --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > > > @@ -20,8 +20,7 @@ typedef int (*pm_callback_t)(struct device *);
> > > > >
> > > > > static pm_callback_t __rpm_get_callback(struct device *dev, size_t cb_offset)
> > > > > {
> > > > > - pm_callback_t cb;
> > > > > - const struct dev_pm_ops *ops;
> > > > > + const struct dev_pm_ops *ops = NULL;
> > > > >
> > > > > if (dev->pm_domain)
> > > > > ops = &dev->pm_domain->ops;
> > > > > @@ -31,18 +30,14 @@ static pm_callback_t __rpm_get_callback(struct device *dev, size_t cb_offset)
> > > > > ops = dev->class->pm;
> > > > > else if (dev->bus && dev->bus->pm)
> > > > > ops = dev->bus->pm;
> > > > > - else
> > > > > - ops = NULL;
> > > > >
> > > > > if (ops)
> > > > > - cb = *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)ops + cb_offset);
> > > > > - else
> > > > > - cb = NULL;
> > > > > + return *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)ops + cb_offset);
> > > >
> > > > This is a change in behavior in case the callback turns out to be NULL:
> > > > - before, it would fall back to the driver-specific callback below,
> > > > - after, it always returns NULL.
> > >
> > > Good point and sorry for missing this!
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (!cb && dev->driver && dev->driver->pm)
> > > > > - cb = *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)dev->driver->pm + cb_offset);
> > > > > + if (dev->driver && dev->driver->pm)
> > > > > + return *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)dev->driver->pm + cb_offset);
> > > > >
> > > > > - return cb;
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > }
> > > >
> > >
> > > Something like the patch below (modulo gmail-induced whitespace
> > > breakage) should restore the previous behavior if I'm not mistaken:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 9 +++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > @@ -31,8 +31,13 @@ static pm_callback_t __rpm_get_callback(
> > > else if (dev->bus && dev->bus->pm)
> > > ops = dev->bus->pm;
> > >
> > > - if (ops)
> > > - return *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)ops + cb_offset);
> > > + if (ops) {
> > > + pm_callback_t cb;
> > > +
> > > + cb = *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)ops + cb_offset);
> > > + if (cb)
> > > + return cb;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > if (dev->driver && dev->driver->pm)
> > > return *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)dev->driver->pm + cb_offset);
> >
> > Which is now more complex than the original?
>
> Arguably so.
>
> OK, I'll drop the commit in question then, sorry Bjorn.
Really sorry about this. Think I'm all out of brown paper bags :(
Thanks for catching this, Geert, and sorry for all the time you had to
spend debugging it.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-24 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-15 18:18 Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-13 20:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-01-24 11:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-24 14:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-01-24 14:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-24 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-01-24 15:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-01-24 16:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230124150558.GA1061961@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®