From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, parav@nvidia.com, elic@nvidia.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] virtio: VIRTIO_DEVICE_F_MASK for all per-device features
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 12:29:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230202122851-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1675207345-22328-5-git-send-email-si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 03:22:22PM -0800, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> Introduce VIRTIO_DEVICE_F_MASK bitmask used for identification
> of per-device features. Feature bits VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_START
> through VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_END are reserved for transport
> features hence are not counted as per-device features against
> the 64bit feature space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
Pls don't add this in uapi, people tend to depend on this and then
things fail when we extend virtio. For example this won't work with >64
feature bits.
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> index 3c05162..3bdc7ed 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,14 @@
> #define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_START 28
> #define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_END 41
>
> +/*
> + * Bitmask for all per-device features: feature bits VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_START
> + * through VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_END are unset, i.e. 0xfffffc000fffffff for
> + * all 64bit features
> + */
> +#define VIRTIO_DEVICE_F_MASK (~0ULL << (VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_END + 1) | \
> + ((1ULL << VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_START) - 1))
> +
> #ifndef VIRTIO_CONFIG_NO_LEGACY
> /* Do we get callbacks when the ring is completely used, even if we've
> * suppressed them? */
> --
> 1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-02 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-31 23:22 [PATCH v2 0/7] features provisioning fixes and mlx5_vdpa support Si-Wei Liu
2023-01-31 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] vdpa: fix improper error message when adding vdpa dev Si-Wei Liu
2023-02-02 4:45 ` Parav Pandit
2023-02-02 13:13 ` Eli Cohen
2023-01-31 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] vdpa: conditionally read STATUS in config space Si-Wei Liu
2023-02-02 4:58 ` Parav Pandit
2023-01-31 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] vdpa: validate provisioned device features against specified attribute Si-Wei Liu
2023-02-02 5:05 ` Parav Pandit
2023-02-02 21:58 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-02-02 22:01 ` Parav Pandit
2023-01-31 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] virtio: VIRTIO_DEVICE_F_MASK for all per-device features Si-Wei Liu
2023-02-02 17:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-02-02 22:00 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-01-31 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] vdpa: validate device feature provisioning against supported class Si-Wei Liu
2023-02-03 8:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-03 19:32 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-01-31 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] vdpa/mlx5: conditionally show MTU and STATUS in config space Si-Wei Liu
2023-02-02 13:31 ` Eli Cohen
2023-02-02 22:18 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-02-03 8:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-03 19:37 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-01-31 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] vdpa/mlx5: support device features provisioning Si-Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230202122851-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=elic@nvidia.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome