From: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, bgardon@google.com,
dmatlack@google.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Subject: [Patch v2 1/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Make separate function to check for SPTEs atomic write conditions
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 11:28:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230203192822.106773-2-vipinsh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230203192822.106773-1-vipinsh@google.com>
Move condition checks in kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte() for writing spte
atomically in a separate function.
New function will be used in future commits to clear bits in SPTE.
Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h | 16 +++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
index f0af385c56e0..30a52e5e68de 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
@@ -29,11 +29,10 @@ static inline void __kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 new_spte)
WRITE_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(sptep), new_spte);
}
-static inline u64 kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 old_spte,
- u64 new_spte, int level)
+static inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 old_spte, int level)
{
/*
- * Atomically write the SPTE if it is a shadow-present, leaf SPTE with
+ * Atomically write SPTEs if it is a shadow-present, leaf SPTE with
* volatile bits, i.e. has bits that can be set outside of mmu_lock.
* The Writable bit can be set by KVM's fast page fault handler, and
* Accessed and Dirty bits can be set by the CPU.
@@ -44,8 +43,15 @@ static inline u64 kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 old_spte,
* logic needs to be reassessed if KVM were to use non-leaf Accessed
* bits, e.g. to skip stepping down into child SPTEs when aging SPTEs.
*/
- if (is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte) && is_last_spte(old_spte, level) &&
- spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte))
+ return is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte) &&
+ is_last_spte(old_spte, level) &&
+ spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte);
+}
+
+static inline u64 kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 old_spte,
+ u64 new_spte, int level)
+{
+ if (kvm_tdp_mmu_spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte, level))
return kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte_atomic(sptep, new_spte);
__kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(sptep, new_spte);
--
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-03 19:28 [Patch v2 0/5] Optimize clear dirty log Vipin Sharma
2023-02-03 19:28 ` Vipin Sharma [this message]
2023-02-06 22:09 ` [Patch v2 1/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Make separate function to check for SPTEs atomic write conditions Ben Gardon
2023-02-06 23:17 ` David Matlack
2023-02-03 19:28 ` [Patch v2 2/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize SPTE change flow for clear-dirty-log Vipin Sharma
2023-02-06 22:06 ` Ben Gardon
2023-02-06 23:34 ` David Matlack
2023-02-07 17:29 ` Vipin Sharma
2023-02-06 23:41 ` David Matlack
2023-02-07 17:36 ` Vipin Sharma
2023-02-07 17:47 ` David Matlack
2023-02-08 23:44 ` Vipin Sharma
2023-02-06 23:53 ` David Matlack
2023-02-07 17:41 ` Vipin Sharma
2023-02-03 19:28 ` [Patch v2 3/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize SPTE change for aging gfn range Vipin Sharma
2023-02-06 22:17 ` Ben Gardon
2023-02-07 17:48 ` Vipin Sharma
2023-02-06 23:56 ` David Matlack
2023-02-07 17:50 ` Vipin Sharma
2023-02-03 19:28 ` [Patch v2 4/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove handle_changed_spte_dirty_log() Vipin Sharma
2023-02-06 23:59 ` David Matlack
2023-02-07 17:51 ` Vipin Sharma
2023-02-03 19:28 ` [Patch v2 5/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Merge all handle_changed_pte* functions Vipin Sharma
2023-02-06 22:33 ` Ben Gardon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230203192822.106773-2-vipinsh@google.com \
--to=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®