From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/unwind/orc: Fix unwind ip when kprobes hits push/pop
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:30:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230210213053.fscxeamu7h56mjaj@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221201085311.249883-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:53:11PM +0800, Chen Zhongjin wrote:
> When unwind stack at asm_exc_int3, the orc type is UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_REGS
> and the unwinder will use pt_regs->ip to find next orc, which point to
> the probed insn + INT3_INSN_SIZE.
>
> If the probed insn is push/pop, it will point to the next insn which has
> different orc state. Before the probed insn has been really excuted in
> single step, using next insn ip to find orc will get a wrong unwinding
> result.
>
> So, when there is kprobe running and the previous op code is int3,
> state->signal should be false so that ip - 1 will be used to find next
> orc, until the probed push/pop has been single steped and kprobe set
> kprobe_status as KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE.
>
> Fixes: ee9f8fce9964 ("x86/unwind: Add the ORC unwinder")
> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Hi Chen,
Thanks for reporting this, and sorry for the delay. I would rather fix
this in a more general way, by specifying 'signal' (or lack thereof) in
the ORC data. I will work up a patch.
--
Josh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-10 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 8:53 Chen Zhongjin
2023-02-10 21:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230210213053.fscxeamu7h56mjaj@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chenzhongjin@huawei.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®