From: Jakob Koschel <jkl820.git@gmail.com>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pietro Borrello <borrello@diag.uniroma1.it>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>, Jakob Koschel <jkl820.git@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] watchdog: avoid usage of iterator after loop
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 14:59:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230301-watchdog-avoid-iter-after-loop-v2-1-8411e3bbe0de@gmail.com> (raw)
If potentially no valid element is found, 'p' would contain an invalid
pointer past the iterator loop. To ensure 'p' is valid under any
circumstances, the kfree() should be within the loop body.
Additionally, Linus proposed to avoid any use of the list iterator
variable after the loop, in the attempt to move the list iterator
variable declaration into the macro to avoid any potential misuse after
the loop [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jkl820.git@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- avoid returning within the list iterator
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301-watchdog-avoid-iter-after-loop-v1-1-851f583be9f7@gmail.com
---
drivers/watchdog/watchdog_pretimeout.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_pretimeout.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_pretimeout.c
index 376a495ab80c..e5295c990fa1 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_pretimeout.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_pretimeout.c
@@ -207,10 +207,9 @@ void watchdog_unregister_pretimeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
list_for_each_entry_safe(p, t, &pretimeout_list, entry) {
if (p->wdd == wdd) {
list_del(&p->entry);
+ kfree(p);
break;
}
}
spin_unlock_irq(&pretimeout_lock);
-
- kfree(p);
}
---
base-commit: c0927a7a5391f7d8e593e5e50ead7505a23cadf9
change-id: 20230301-watchdog-avoid-iter-after-loop-a197bf201435
Best regards,
--
Jakob Koschel <jkl820.git@gmail.com>
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-13 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-13 13:59 Jakob Koschel [this message]
2023-03-13 14:59 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230301-watchdog-avoid-iter-after-loop-v2-1-8411e3bbe0de@gmail.com \
--to=jkl820.git@gmail.com \
--cc=borrello@diag.uniroma1.it \
--cc=c.giuffrida@vu.nl \
--cc=h.j.bos@vu.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®