mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Xu, Pengfei" <pengfei.xu@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH -V2 3/3] migrate_pages: try migrate in batch asynchronously firstly
Date: Fri,  3 Mar 2023 11:01:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230303030155.160983-4-ying.huang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230303030155.160983-1-ying.huang@intel.com>

When we have locked more than one folios, we cannot wait the lock or
bit (e.g., page lock, buffer head lock, writeback bit) synchronously.
Otherwise deadlock may be triggered.  This make it hard to batch the
synchronous migration directly.

This patch re-enables batching synchronous migration via trying to
migrate in batch asynchronously firstly.  And any folios that are
failed to be migrated asynchronously will be migrated synchronously
one by one.

Test shows that this can restore the TLB flushing batching performance
for synchronous migration effectively.

Fixes: 5dfab109d519 ("migrate_pages: batch _unmap and _move")
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Xu, Pengfei" <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
---
 mm/migrate.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 61009e2ae2be..ae86345e12a5 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -1115,9 +1115,8 @@ static void migrate_folio_done(struct folio *src,
 /* Obtain the lock on page, remove all ptes. */
 static int migrate_folio_unmap(new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t put_new_page,
 			       unsigned long private, struct folio *src,
-			       struct folio **dstp, int force,
-			       enum migrate_mode mode, enum migrate_reason reason,
-			       struct list_head *ret)
+			       struct folio **dstp, enum migrate_mode mode,
+			       enum migrate_reason reason, struct list_head *ret)
 {
 	struct folio *dst;
 	int rc = -EAGAIN;
@@ -1147,7 +1146,7 @@ static int migrate_folio_unmap(new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t put_new_page
 	dst->private = NULL;
 
 	if (!folio_trylock(src)) {
-		if (!force || mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC)
+		if (mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC)
 			goto out;
 
 		/*
@@ -1185,8 +1184,6 @@ static int migrate_folio_unmap(new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t put_new_page
 			rc = -EBUSY;
 			goto out;
 		}
-		if (!force)
-			goto out;
 		folio_wait_writeback(src);
 	}
 
@@ -1500,6 +1497,9 @@ static inline int try_split_folio(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *split_f
 #define NR_MAX_BATCHED_MIGRATION	512
 #endif
 #define NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY	10
+#define NR_MAX_MIGRATE_ASYNC_RETRY	3
+#define NR_MAX_MIGRATE_SYNC_RETRY					\
+	(NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY - NR_MAX_MIGRATE_ASYNC_RETRY)
 
 struct migrate_pages_stats {
 	int nr_succeeded;	/* Normal and large folios migrated successfully, in
@@ -1681,8 +1681,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
 			}
 
 			rc = migrate_folio_unmap(get_new_page, put_new_page, private,
-						 folio, &dst, pass > 2, mode,
-						 reason, ret_folios);
+						 folio, &dst, mode, reason, ret_folios);
 			/*
 			 * The rules are:
 			 *	Success: folio will be freed
@@ -1860,6 +1859,51 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
 	return rc;
 }
 
+static int migrate_pages_sync(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
+		free_page_t put_new_page, unsigned long private,
+		enum migrate_mode mode, int reason, struct list_head *ret_folios,
+		struct list_head *split_folios, struct migrate_pages_stats *stats)
+{
+	int rc, nr_failed = 0;
+	LIST_HEAD(folios);
+	struct migrate_pages_stats astats;
+
+	memset(&astats, 0, sizeof(astats));
+	/* Try to migrate in batch with MIGRATE_ASYNC mode firstly */
+	rc = migrate_pages_batch(from, get_new_page, put_new_page, private, MIGRATE_ASYNC,
+				 reason, &folios, split_folios, &astats,
+				 NR_MAX_MIGRATE_ASYNC_RETRY);
+	stats->nr_succeeded += astats.nr_succeeded;
+	stats->nr_thp_succeeded += astats.nr_thp_succeeded;
+	stats->nr_thp_split += astats.nr_thp_split;
+	if (rc < 0) {
+		stats->nr_failed_pages += astats.nr_failed_pages;
+		stats->nr_thp_failed += astats.nr_thp_failed;
+		list_splice_tail(&folios, ret_folios);
+		return rc;
+	}
+	stats->nr_thp_failed += astats.nr_thp_split;
+	nr_failed += astats.nr_thp_split;
+	/*
+	 * Fall back to migrate all failed folios one by one synchronously. All
+	 * failed folios except split THPs will be retried, so their failure
+	 * isn't counted
+	 */
+	list_splice_tail_init(&folios, from);
+	while (!list_empty(from)) {
+		list_move(from->next, &folios);
+		rc = migrate_pages_batch(&folios, get_new_page, put_new_page,
+					 private, mode, reason, ret_folios,
+					 split_folios, stats, NR_MAX_MIGRATE_SYNC_RETRY);
+		list_splice_tail_init(&folios, ret_folios);
+		if (rc < 0)
+			return rc;
+		nr_failed += rc;
+	}
+
+	return nr_failed;
+}
+
 /*
  * migrate_pages - migrate the folios specified in a list, to the free folios
  *		   supplied as the target for the page migration
@@ -1891,7 +1935,7 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
 		enum migrate_mode mode, int reason, unsigned int *ret_succeeded)
 {
 	int rc, rc_gather;
-	int nr_pages, batch;
+	int nr_pages;
 	struct folio *folio, *folio2;
 	LIST_HEAD(folios);
 	LIST_HEAD(ret_folios);
@@ -1907,10 +1951,6 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
 	if (rc_gather < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	if (mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC)
-		batch = NR_MAX_BATCHED_MIGRATION;
-	else
-		batch = 1;
 again:
 	nr_pages = 0;
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, folio2, from, lru) {
@@ -1921,16 +1961,20 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
 		}
 
 		nr_pages += folio_nr_pages(folio);
-		if (nr_pages >= batch)
+		if (nr_pages >= NR_MAX_BATCHED_MIGRATION)
 			break;
 	}
-	if (nr_pages >= batch)
+	if (nr_pages >= NR_MAX_BATCHED_MIGRATION)
 		list_cut_before(&folios, from, &folio2->lru);
 	else
 		list_splice_init(from, &folios);
-	rc = migrate_pages_batch(&folios, get_new_page, put_new_page, private,
-				 mode, reason, &ret_folios, &split_folios, &stats,
-				 NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY);
+	if (mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC)
+		rc = migrate_pages_batch(&folios, get_new_page, put_new_page, private,
+					 mode, reason, &ret_folios, &split_folios, &stats,
+					 NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY);
+	else
+		rc = migrate_pages_sync(&folios, get_new_page, put_new_page, private,
+					mode, reason, &ret_folios, &split_folios, &stats);
 	list_splice_tail_init(&folios, &ret_folios);
 	if (rc < 0) {
 		rc_gather = rc;
-- 
2.39.2


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-03  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-03  3:01 [PATCH -V2 0/3] migrate_pages: fix deadlock in batched synchronous migration Huang Ying
2023-03-03  3:01 ` [PATCH -V2 1/3] migrate_pages: fix deadlock in batched migration Huang Ying
2023-03-03  3:01 ` [PATCH -V2 2/3] migrate_pages: move split folios processing out of migrate_pages_batch() Huang Ying
2023-03-03  3:01 ` Huang Ying [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230303030155.160983-4-ying.huang@intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=pengfei.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=shr@devkernel.io \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®