mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
	daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 10/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Introduce per Power Limit lock
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 23:38:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230316153841.3666-11-rui.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230316153841.3666-1-rui.zhang@intel.com>

With RAPL MSR/MMIO Interface, each RAPL domain has one Power Limit
register. Each Power Limit register has one or two Power Limits and one
lock bit. The number of Power Limits the lock bit applies to depends on
the number of Power Limits supported by the Power Limit register.

With RAPL TPMI Interface, each RAPL domain supports multiple Power
Limits. And each Power Limit has a register with a lock bit.

To handle this, introduce per Power Limit lock support. For existing
RAPL MSR/MMIO Interfaces, the lock bit in the Power Limit register
applies to all the Power Limits controlled by this register.

Remove the per domain DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED flag at the same time
because it can be replaced by the per Power Limit lock.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
---
 drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | 40 ++++++++++++++--------------
 include/linux/intel_rapl.h           |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
index 3e9141dedc1d..636e05aa711b 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ enum unit_type {
 
 #define	DOMAIN_STATE_INACTIVE           BIT(0)
 #define	DOMAIN_STATE_POWER_LIMIT_SET    BIT(1)
-#define DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED        BIT(2)
 
 static const char *pl_names[NR_POWER_LIMITS] = {
 	[POWER_LIMIT1] = "long_term",
@@ -108,6 +107,7 @@ enum pl_prims {
 	PL_LIMIT,
 	PL_TIME_WINDOW,
 	PL_MAX_POWER,
+	PL_LOCK,
 };
 
 static bool is_pl_valid(struct rapl_domain *rd, int pl)
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static bool is_pl_valid(struct rapl_domain *rd, int pl)
 	return rd->rpl[pl].name ? true : false;
 }
 
-static int get_pl_prim(int pl, enum pl_prims prim)
+static int get_pl_prim(struct rapl_domain *rd, int pl, enum pl_prims prim)
 {
 	switch (pl) {
 	case POWER_LIMIT1:
@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ static int get_pl_prim(int pl, enum pl_prims prim)
 			return TIME_WINDOW1;
 		if (prim == PL_MAX_POWER)
 			return THERMAL_SPEC_POWER;
+		if (prim == PL_LOCK)
+			return rd->rp->priv->limits[rd->id] & BIT(POWER_LIMIT2) ?
+			       FW_HIGH_LOCK : FW_LOCK;
 		return -EINVAL;
 	case POWER_LIMIT2:
 		if (prim == PL_ENABLE)
@@ -143,6 +146,9 @@ static int get_pl_prim(int pl, enum pl_prims prim)
 			return TIME_WINDOW2;
 		if (prim == PL_MAX_POWER)
 			return MAX_POWER;
+		if (prim == PL_LOCK)
+			return rd->rp->priv->limits[rd->id] & BIT(POWER_LIMIT2) ?
+			       FW_HIGH_LOCK : FW_LOCK;
 		return -EINVAL;
 	case POWER_LIMIT4:
 		if (prim == PL_LIMIT)
@@ -314,7 +320,7 @@ static int get_domain_enable(struct powercap_zone *power_zone, bool *mode)
 	u64 val;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (rd->state & DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED) {
+	if (rd->rpl[POWER_LIMIT1].locked) {
 		*mode = false;
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -599,6 +605,8 @@ static struct rapl_primitive_info rpis_default[NR_RAPL_PRIMITIVES] = {
 			    RAPL_DOMAIN_REG_STATUS, ENERGY_UNIT, 0),
 	[FW_LOCK] = PRIMITIVE_INFO_INIT(FW_LOCK, POWER_LOW_LOCK, 31,
 			    RAPL_DOMAIN_REG_LIMIT, ARBITRARY_UNIT, 0),
+	[FW_HIGH_LOCK] = PRIMITIVE_INFO_INIT(FW_LOCK, POWER_HIGH_LOCK, 63,
+			    RAPL_DOMAIN_REG_LIMIT, ARBITRARY_UNIT, 0),
 	[PL1_ENABLE] = PRIMITIVE_INFO_INIT(PL1_ENABLE, POWER_LIMIT1_ENABLE, 15,
 			    RAPL_DOMAIN_REG_LIMIT, ARBITRARY_UNIT, 0),
 	[PL1_CLAMP] = PRIMITIVE_INFO_INIT(PL1_CLAMP, POWER_LIMIT1_CLAMP, 16,
@@ -719,11 +727,6 @@ static int rapl_read_data_raw(struct rapl_domain *rd,
 
 	cpu = rd->rp->lead_cpu;
 
-	/* domain with 2 limits has different bit */
-	if (prim == FW_LOCK && (rd->rp->priv->limits[rd->id] & BIT(POWER_LIMIT2))) {
-		rpi->mask = POWER_HIGH_LOCK;
-		rpi->shift = 63;
-	}
 	/* non-hardware data are collected by the polling thread */
 	if (rpi->flag & RAPL_PRIMITIVE_DERIVED) {
 		*data = rd->rdd.primitives[prim];
@@ -781,7 +784,7 @@ static int rapl_write_data_raw(struct rapl_domain *rd,
 static int rapl_read_pl_data(struct rapl_domain *rd, int pl,
 			      enum pl_prims pl_prim, bool xlate, u64 *data)
 {
-	enum rapl_primitives prim = get_pl_prim(pl, pl_prim);
+	enum rapl_primitives prim = get_pl_prim(rd, pl, pl_prim);
 
 	if (!is_pl_valid(rd, pl))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -793,12 +796,12 @@ static int rapl_write_pl_data(struct rapl_domain *rd, int pl,
 			       enum pl_prims pl_prim,
 			       unsigned long long value)
 {
-	enum rapl_primitives prim = get_pl_prim(pl, pl_prim);
+	enum rapl_primitives prim = get_pl_prim(rd, pl, pl_prim);
 
 	if (!is_pl_valid(rd, pl))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (rd->state & DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED) {
+	if (rd->rpl[pl].locked) {
 		pr_warn("%s:%s:%s locked by BIOS\n", rd->rp->name, rd->name, pl_names[pl]);
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
@@ -1305,17 +1308,14 @@ static void rapl_detect_powerlimit(struct rapl_domain *rd)
 	u64 val64;
 	int i;
 
-	/* check if the domain is locked by BIOS, ignore if MSR doesn't exist */
-	if (!rapl_read_data_raw(rd, FW_LOCK, false, &val64)) {
-		if (val64) {
-			pr_info("RAPL %s domain %s locked by BIOS\n",
-				rd->rp->name, rd->name);
-			rd->state |= DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED;
+	for (i = POWER_LIMIT1; i < NR_POWER_LIMITS; i++) {
+		if (!rapl_read_pl_data(rd, i, PL_LOCK, false, &val64)) {
+			rd->rpl[i].locked = val64;
+			if (val64)
+				pr_info("%s:%s:%s locked by BIOS\n",
+					rd->rp->name, rd->name, pl_names[i]);
 		}
-	}
 
-	/* check if power limit exists, otherwise domain is monitoring only */
-	for (i = POWER_LIMIT1; i < NR_POWER_LIMITS; i++) {
 		if (rapl_read_pl_data(rd, i, PL_ENABLE, false, &val64))
 			rd->rpl[i].name = NULL;
 	}
diff --git a/include/linux/intel_rapl.h b/include/linux/intel_rapl.h
index 86cd06bbea0c..325ec00be7a7 100644
--- a/include/linux/intel_rapl.h
+++ b/include/linux/intel_rapl.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ enum rapl_primitives {
 	POWER_LIMIT4,
 	ENERGY_COUNTER,
 	FW_LOCK,
+	FW_HIGH_LOCK,
 
 	PL1_ENABLE,		/* power limit 1, aka long term */
 	PL1_CLAMP,		/* allow frequency to go below OS request */
@@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ struct rapl_power_limit {
 	struct powercap_zone_constraint *constraint;
 	struct rapl_domain *domain;
 	const char *name;
+	bool locked;
 	u64 last_power_limit;
 };
 
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-16 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-16 15:38 [PATCH 0/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Introduce RAPL TPMI support Zhang Rui
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 01/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Remove unused field in struct rapl_if_priv Zhang Rui
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 02/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Allow probing without CPUID match Zhang Rui
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 03/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Support per Interface rapl_defaults Zhang Rui
2023-03-30 17:54   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-04-02  7:40     ` Zhang, Rui
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 04/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Support per Interface primitive information Zhang Rui
2023-03-30 17:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-04-02  7:43     ` Zhang, Rui
2023-04-03 17:51       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 05/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Support per domain energy/power/time unit Zhang Rui
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 06/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Use index to initialize primitive information Zhang Rui
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 07/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Change primitive order Zhang Rui
2023-04-07 11:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 08/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Use bitmap for Power Limits Zhang Rui
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 09/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Cleanup Power Limits support Zhang Rui
2023-03-16 15:38 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2023-04-07 12:01   ` [PATCH 10/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Introduce per Power Limit lock Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 11/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Remove redundant cpu parameter Zhang Rui
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 12/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Make cpu optional for rapl_package Zhang Rui
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 13/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Introduce RAPL I/F type Zhang Rui
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 14/15] powercap/intel_rapl: Introduce core support for TPMI interface Zhang Rui
2023-03-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 15/15] powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi: Introduce RAPL TPMI interface driver Zhang Rui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230316153841.3666-11-rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®