From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, <patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: wm8994: Use PROBE_FORCE_SYNCHRONOUS
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:23:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230324092353.GO68926@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=X0SAEk_iUGQ=J-PWk_MzVc7ZikBM3N8rrnhGFzcdBNpw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:00:32AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:45 AM Charles Keepax
> <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think really the best place to look at this would be at the
> > regulator level. It is fine if mfd_add_devices passes, the problem
> > really is that the regulator core doesn't realise the regulator is
> > going to be arriving, and thus returns a dummy regulator, rather
> > than returning EPROBE_DEFER. If it did the MFD driver would probe
> > defer at the point of requesting the regulator, which would all
> > make sense.
>
> I think something like your suggestion could be made to work for the
> "microphone" supply in the arizona MFD, but not for the others looked
> at here.
>
> The problem is that if the MFD driver gets -EPROBE_DEFER then it will
> go through its error handling path and call mfd_remove_devices().
> That'll remove the sub-device providing the regulator. If you try
> again, you'll just do the same. :-)
>
> Specifically in wm8994 after we've populated the regulator sub-devices
> then we turn them on and start talking to the device.
>
> I think the two options I have could both work for wm8994's case:
> either add some type of "my children have done probing" to MFD and
> move the turning on of regulators / talking to devices there, or add
> another stub-device and add it there. ;-)
Is this true if we keep the regulator as sync though? Yes it will
remove the children but when it re-adds them the reason that the
regulator probe deferred in the first place will hopefully be
removed. So it will now fully probe in path.
Thanks,
Charles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-24 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20230323083330eucas1p1f7e3f9beb5ba168c6b13374d74c158f0@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-03-23 8:33 ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-03-23 11:40 ` Charles Keepax
2023-03-23 16:53 ` Doug Anderson
2023-03-23 16:57 ` Mark Brown
2023-03-23 17:45 ` Charles Keepax
2023-03-23 17:49 ` Mark Brown
2023-03-24 9:21 ` Charles Keepax
2023-03-23 18:00 ` Doug Anderson
2023-03-24 9:23 ` Charles Keepax [this message]
2023-03-24 15:06 ` Doug Anderson
2023-03-24 15:44 ` Charles Keepax
2023-03-23 13:49 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230324092353.GO68926@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com \
--to=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®