From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
"Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/12] sched/topology: Remove SHARED_CHILD from ASYM_PACKING
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 13:31:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230406203148.19182-10-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230406203148.19182-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Only x86 and Power7 use ASYM_PACKING. They use it differently.
Power7 has cores of equal priority, but the SMT siblings of a core have
different priorities. Parent scheduling domains do not need (nor have) the
ASYM_PACKING flag. SHARED_CHILD is not needed. Using SHARED_PARENT would
cause the topology debug code to complain.
X86 has cores of different priority, but all the SMT siblings of the core
have equal priority. It needs ASYM_PACKING at the MC level, but not at the
SMT level (it also needs it at upper levels if they have scheduling groups
of different priority). Removing ASYM_PACKING from the SMT domain causes
the topology debug code to complain.
Remove SHARED_CHILD for now. We still need a topology check that satisfies
both architectures.
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v3:
* Removed spurious space.
Changes since v2:
* Introduced this patch.
Changes since v1:
* N/A
---
include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h b/include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h
index 57bde66d95f7..fad77b5172e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h
@@ -132,12 +132,9 @@ SD_FLAG(SD_SERIALIZE, SDF_SHARED_PARENT | SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS)
/*
* Place busy tasks earlier in the domain
*
- * SHARED_CHILD: Usually set on the SMT level. Technically could be set further
- * up, but currently assumed to be set from the base domain
- * upwards (see update_top_cache_domain()).
* NEEDS_GROUPS: Load balancing flag.
*/
-SD_FLAG(SD_ASYM_PACKING, SDF_SHARED_CHILD | SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS)
+SD_FLAG(SD_ASYM_PACKING, SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS)
/*
* Prefer to place tasks in a sibling domain
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 20:31 [PATCH v4 00/12] sched: Avoid unnecessary migrations within SMT domains Ricardo Neri
2023-04-06 20:31 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] sched/fair: Move is_core_idle() out of CONFIG_NUMA Ricardo Neri
2023-05-10 13:49 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ricardo Neri
2023-04-06 20:31 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] sched/fair: Only do asym_packing load balancing from fully idle SMT cores Ricardo Neri
2023-05-10 13:49 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ricardo Neri
2023-04-06 20:31 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] sched/fair: Simplify asym_packing logic for " Ricardo Neri
2023-05-10 13:49 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ricardo Neri
2023-04-06 20:31 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] sched/fair: Let low-priority cores help high-priority busy " Ricardo Neri
2023-05-10 13:49 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ricardo Neri
2023-04-06 20:31 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] sched/fair: Keep a fully_busy SMT sched group as busiest Ricardo Neri
2023-05-10 13:49 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ricardo Neri
2023-05-12 18:41 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] " Shrikanth Hegde
2023-05-19 0:01 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-04-06 20:31 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] sched/fair: Use the busiest group to set prefer_sibling Ricardo Neri
2023-05-10 13:49 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ricardo Neri
2023-04-06 20:31 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] sched/fair: Do not even the number of busy CPUs via asym_packing Ricardo Neri
2023-05-10 13:49 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ricardo Neri
2023-04-06 20:31 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] sched/topology: Check SDF_SHARED_CHILD in highest_flag_domain() Ricardo Neri
2023-05-10 13:49 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ricardo Neri
2023-04-06 20:31 ` Ricardo Neri [this message]
2023-05-10 13:49 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/topology: Remove SHARED_CHILD from ASYM_PACKING tip-bot2 for Ricardo Neri
2023-04-06 20:31 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] x86/sched: Remove SD_ASYM_PACKING from the SMT domain flags Ricardo Neri
2023-05-10 13:49 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ricardo Neri
2023-04-06 20:31 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] x86/sched/itmt: Give all SMT siblings of a core the same priority Ricardo Neri
2023-05-10 13:49 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ricardo Neri
2023-04-06 20:31 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] x86/sched: Add the SD_ASYM_PACKING flag to the die domain of hybrid processors Ricardo Neri
2023-05-10 13:49 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Chen Yu
2023-04-29 15:32 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] sched: Avoid unnecessary migrations within SMT domains Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-01 18:30 ` Tim Chen
2023-05-02 1:42 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-05-02 1:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-12 18:23 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-05-19 0:03 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-05-22 7:55 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230406203148.19182-10-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®