From: Tze-nan Wu <Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>
To: <rostedt@goodmis.org>, <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: <bobule.chang@mediatek.com>, <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
<Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>, <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>,
<npiggin@gmail.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] ring-buffer: Prevent inconsistent operation on cpu_buffer->resize_disabled
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 15:35:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230410073512.13362-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230409024616.31099-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>
Write to buffer_size_kb can permanently fail, due to cpu_online_mask may
changed between two for_each_online_buffer_cpu loops.
The number of increasing and decreasing on cpu_buffer->resize_disable
may be inconsistent, leading that the resize_disabled in some CPUs
becoming none zero after ring_buffer_reset_online_cpus return.
This issue can be reproduced by "echo 0 > trace" while hotplugging cpu.
After reproducing success, we can find out buffer_size_kb will not be
functional anymore.
Prevent the two "loops" in this function from iterating through different
online cpus by copying cpu_online_mask at the entry of the function.
Changes from v1 to v3:
Declare the cpumask variable statically rather than dynamically.
Changes from v2 to v3:
Considering holding cpu_hotplug_lock too long because of the
synchronize_rcu(), maybe it's better to prevent the issue by copying
cpu_online_mask at the entry of the function as V1 does, instead of
using cpus_read_lock().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230408052226.25268-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304082051.Dp50upfS-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304081615.eiaqpbV8-lkp@intel.com/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: npiggin@gmail.com
Fixes: b23d7a5f4a07 ("ring-buffer: speed up buffer resets by avoiding synchronize_rcu for each CPU")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Tze-nan Wu <Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 76a2d91eecad..dc758930dacb 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -288,9 +288,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_event_data);
#define for_each_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) \
for_each_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask)
-#define for_each_online_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) \
- for_each_cpu_and(cpu, buffer->cpumask, cpu_online_mask)
-
#define TS_SHIFT 27
#define TS_MASK ((1ULL << TS_SHIFT) - 1)
#define TS_DELTA_TEST (~TS_MASK)
@@ -5353,12 +5350,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_reset_cpu);
void ring_buffer_reset_online_cpus(struct trace_buffer *buffer)
{
struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
+ cpumask_t reset_online_cpumask;
int cpu;
+ /*
+ * Record cpu_online_mask here to make sure we iterate through the same
+ * online CPUs in the following two loops.
+ */
+ cpumask_copy(&reset_online_cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+
/* prevent another thread from changing buffer sizes */
mutex_lock(&buffer->mutex);
- for_each_online_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) {
+ for_each_cpu_and(cpu, buffer->cpumask, &reset_online_cpumask) {
cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
atomic_inc(&cpu_buffer->resize_disabled);
@@ -5368,7 +5372,7 @@ void ring_buffer_reset_online_cpus(struct trace_buffer *buffer)
/* Make sure all commits have finished */
synchronize_rcu();
- for_each_online_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) {
+ for_each_cpu_and(cpu, buffer->cpumask, &reset_online_cpumask) {
cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
reset_disabled_cpu_buffer(cpu_buffer);
--
2.18.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-10 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-08 5:22 [PATCH] " Tze-nan Wu
2023-04-08 8:35 ` kernel test robot
2023-04-08 12:20 ` kernel test robot
2023-04-09 2:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Tze-nan Wu
2023-04-09 12:30 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-04-10 1:35 ` Tze-nan Wu (吳澤南)
2023-04-10 7:35 ` Tze-nan Wu [this message]
2023-04-11 16:44 ` [PATCH v3] " Steven Rostedt
2023-04-11 16:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-12 2:27 ` Tze-nan Wu (吳澤南)
2023-04-12 2:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-14 1:16 ` Tze-nan Wu (吳澤南)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230410073512.13362-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com \
--to=tze-nan.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bobule.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®