mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	mike.kravetz@oracle.com, mhocko@suse.com, muchun.song@linux.dev,
	rientjes@google.com, souravpanda@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: provide stronger vmemmap allocation guarantees
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:13:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230412131302.cf42a7f4b710db8c18b7b676@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230412195939.1242462-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>

Lots of questions (ie, missing information!)

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 19:59:39 +0000 Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> wrote:

> HugeTLB pages have a struct page optimizations where struct pages for tail
> pages are freed. However, when HugeTLB pages are destroyed, the memory for
> struct pages (vmemmap) need to be allocated again.
> 
> Currently, __GFP_NORETRY flag is used to allocate the memory for vmemmap,
> but given that this flag makes very little effort to actually reclaim
> memory the returning of huge pages back to the system can be problem.

Are there any reports of this happening in the real world?

> Lets
> use __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL instead. This flag is also performs graceful
> reclaim without causing ooms, but at least it may perform a few retries,
> and will fail only when there is genuinely little amount of unused memory
> in the system.

If so, does this change help?

If the allocation attempt fails, what are the consequences?

What are the potential downsides to this change?  Why did we choose
__GFP_NORETRY in the first place?

What happens if we try harder (eg, GFP_KERNEL)?

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-12 19:59 Pasha Tatashin
2023-04-12 20:13 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2023-04-12 20:18   ` Michal Hocko
2023-04-13 15:05     ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-04-13 15:25       ` Michal Hocko
2023-04-13 17:11         ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-04-13 18:12           ` Michal Hocko
2023-04-15  0:47             ` David Rientjes
2023-04-17  8:33               ` Michal Hocko
2023-04-17 18:51                 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-04-13 14:59   ` Pasha Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230412131302.cf42a7f4b710db8c18b7b676@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=souravpanda@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®