mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] cacheinfo: Check cache properties are present in DT
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 10:14:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230414081453.244787-3-pierre.gondois@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230414081453.244787-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com>

If a Device Tree (DT) is used, the presence of cache properties is
assumed. Not finding any is not considered. For arm64 platforms,
cache information can be fetched from the clidr_el1 register.
Checking whether cache information is available in the DT
allows to switch to using clidr_el1.

init_of_cache_level()
\-of_count_cache_leaves()
will assume there a 2 cache leaves (L1 data/instruction caches), which
can be different from clidr_el1 information.

cache_setup_of_node() tries to read cache properties in the DT.
If there are none, this is considered a success. Knowing no
information was available would allow to switch to using clidr_el1.

Fixes: de0df442ee49 ("cacheinfo: Check 'cache-unified' property to count cache leaves")
Reported-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230404-hatred-swimmer-6fecdf33b57a@spud/
Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
index c5d2293ac2a6..ea8f416852bd 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ bool last_level_cache_is_shared(unsigned int cpu_x, unsigned int cpu_y)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
+
+static bool of_check_cache_nodes(struct device_node *np);
+
 /* OF properties to query for a given cache type */
 struct cache_type_info {
 	const char *size_prop;
@@ -205,6 +208,11 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu)
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
 
+	if (!of_check_cache_nodes(np)) {
+		of_node_put(np);
+		return -ENOENT;
+	}
+
 	prev = np;
 
 	while (index < cache_leaves(cpu)) {
@@ -229,6 +237,25 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool of_check_cache_nodes(struct device_node *np)
+{
+	struct device_node *next;
+
+	if (of_property_present(np, "cache-size")   ||
+	    of_property_present(np, "i-cache-size") ||
+	    of_property_present(np, "d-cache-size") ||
+	    of_property_present(np, "cache-unified"))
+		return true;
+
+	next = of_find_next_cache_node(np);
+	if (next) {
+		of_node_put(next);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int of_count_cache_leaves(struct device_node *np)
 {
 	unsigned int leaves = 0;
@@ -260,6 +287,11 @@ int init_of_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
 	struct device_node *prev = NULL;
 	unsigned int levels = 0, leaves, level;
 
+	if (!of_check_cache_nodes(np)) {
+		of_node_put(np);
+		return -ENOENT;
+	}
+
 	leaves = of_count_cache_leaves(np);
 	if (leaves > 0)
 		levels = 1;
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-14  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-14  8:14 [PATCH v4 0/4] cacheinfo: Correctly fallback to using clidr_el1's information Pierre Gondois
2023-04-14  8:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] cacheinfo: Check sib_leaf in cache_leaves_are_shared() Pierre Gondois
2023-04-14  8:14 ` Pierre Gondois [this message]
2023-04-14  8:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arch_topology: Remove early cacheinfo error message if -ENOENT Pierre Gondois
2023-04-14  8:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] cacheinfo: Add use_arch[|_cache]_info field/function Pierre Gondois
2023-04-14 22:36 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] cacheinfo: Correctly fallback to using clidr_el1's information Florian Fainelli
2023-04-17 14:07 ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230414081453.244787-3-pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --to=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rrendec@redhat.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®