Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] perf: add helper map__fprintf_dsoname_dsoff

[Changbin Du <changbin.du@huawei.com>]

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 09:58:10PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 18/04/23 06:18, Changbin Du wrote:
> > This adds a helper function map__fprintf_dsoname_dsoff() to print dsoname
> > with optional dso offset.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/util/map.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  tools/perf/util/map.h |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/map.c b/tools/perf/util/map.c
> > index d81b6ca18ee9..7da96b41100f 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/map.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/map.c
> > @@ -445,6 +445,19 @@ size_t map__fprintf_dsoname(struct map *map, FILE *fp)
> >  	return fprintf(fp, "%s", dsoname);
> >  }
> >  
> > +size_t map__fprintf_dsoname_dsoff(struct map *map, bool print_off, u64 addr, FILE *fp)
> > +{
> > +	int printed = 0;
> > +
> > +	printed += fprintf(fp, " (");
> > +	printed += map__fprintf_dsoname(map, fp);
> > +	if (print_off && map && map__dso(map) && !map__dso(map)->kernel)
> 
> That will also block vmlinux offsets not just [kernel.kallsyms]
> Is that what was intended?
>
Not only vmlinux, modules are also blocked. We'd better print offset for
vmlinux and modules.

$ sudo perf script -k vmlinux -F +dsoff
       perf-exec 2531039 4120893.685967:          1 cycles:  ffffffff99094ec4 [unknown] (vmlinux)
       perf-exec 2531039 4120893.685970:          1 cycles:  ffffffff99094ec4 [unknown] (vmlinux)
       perf-exec 2531039 4120893.685972:          9 cycles:  ffffffff99094ec4 [unknown] (vmlinux)
       perf-exec 2531039 4120893.685973:        194 cycles:  ffffffff99094ec6 [unknown] (vmlinux)
       perf-exec 2531039 4120893.685974:       4605 cycles:  ffffffff99094ec4 [unknown] (vmlinux)
       perf-exec 2531039 4120893.685976:     108083 cycles:  ffffffff9928e8d0 [unknown] (vmlinux)
              ls 2531039 4120893.686003:    2197682 cycles:  ffffffff993c92bc [unknown] (vmlinux)
              ls 2531039 4120893.686554:    4497190 cycles:  ffffffffc159692b strcasestr+0x7b (/lib/modules/5.15.0-60-generic/extra/isac_ipc.ko)
              ls 2531039 4120893.687700:    4189758 cycles:  ffffffffc18a5d66 delete_net_reject_cache+0x76 (/lib/modules/5.15.0-60-generic/extra/isac_networkfilter.ko)
              ls 2531039 4120893.688786:    3780376 cycles:  ffffffffc18a67de delete_net_process_info+0x5e (/lib/modules/5.15.0-60-generic/extra/isac_networkfilter.ko)
              ls 2531039 4120893.689716:    3416607 cycles:  ffffffffc18a67de delete_net_process_info+0x5e (/lib/modules/5.15.0-60-generic/extra/isac_networkfilter.ko)

But I found addr returned by map__dso_map_ip() for 'vmlinux' is not a 'dso
offset'.

$ sudo perf script -k vmlinux -F +dsoff
       perf-exec 2531039 4120893.685967:          1 cycles:  ffffffff99094ec4 [unknown] (vmlinux+0xffffffff99094ec4)
       perf-exec 2531039 4120893.685970:          1 cycles:  ffffffff99094ec4 [unknown] (vmlinux+0xffffffff99094ec4)
       perf-exec 2531039 4120893.685972:          9 cycles:  ffffffff99094ec4 [unknown] (vmlinux+0xffffffff99094ec4)
       perf-exec 2531039 4120893.685973:        194 cycles:  ffffffff99094ec6 [unknown] (vmlinux+0xffffffff99094ec6)

Do you have better idea?

-- 
Cheers,
Changbin Du