From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tsbogend@alpha.franken.de
Subject: Re: Loongson (and other $ARCHs?) idle VS timer enqueue
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 10:22:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230422082211.GA1215777@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230422081700.GB1214746@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
+ MIPS Thomas
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 10:17:00AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 05:24:36PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 21 2023 at 14:36, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > I'm looking at the __arch_cpu_idle() implementation in Loongarch
> > > and I'm wondering about the rollback code. I don't understand well
> > > that code but with the help from PeterZ I might have seen something,
> > > so tell me if I'm wrong: when an interrupt happens within
> > > __arch_cpu_idle(), handle_vint() rolls back the return value to the
> > > beginning of __arch_cpu_idle(), so that TIF_NEED_RESCHED is checked
> > > again. Is that correct?
> > >
> > > Because if an interrupt fires while in __arch_cpu_idle(), that IRQ
> > > might enqueue a new timer and that new timer needs to be reprogrammed
> > > from the main idle loop and just checking TIF_NEED_RESCHED doesn't
> > > tell about that information.
> >
> > The check for TIF_NEED_RESCHED as loop termination condition is simply
> > wrong. The architecture is not to supposed to loop in arch_cpu_idle().
> >
> > That loop is from Linux 0.9 days. Seems MIPS::__r4k_wait() and
> > loongarch, which copied that muck are still stuck in the 1990'ies.
> >
> > It has to return when an interrupt brings it out of the "idle wait"
> > instruction.
>
> So I think the below is enough for these two...
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S b/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
> index 44ff1ff64260..5a102ff80de0 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(handle_vint)
> ori t0, t0, 0x1f
> xori t0, t0, 0x1f
> bne t0, t1, 1f
> + addi.d t0, t0, 0x20
> LONG_S t0, sp, PT_ERA
> 1: move a0, sp
> move a1, sp
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/genex.S b/arch/mips/kernel/genex.S
> index b6de8e88c1bd..cd6aae441ad9 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/genex.S
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/genex.S
> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ LEAF(__r4k_wait)
> ori k0, 0x1f /* 32 byte rollback region */
> xori k0, 0x1f
> bne k0, k1, \handler
> + addiu k0, 0x20
> MTC0 k0, CP0_EPC
> .set pop
> .endm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-22 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-21 12:36 Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-21 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-21 16:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-22 8:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-22 11:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-22 14:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-21 15:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-04-21 16:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-21 20:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-04-22 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-22 8:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-04-22 14:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-22 15:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-23 13:52 ` bibo, mao
2023-04-24 8:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-24 11:23 ` maobibo
2023-04-25 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-25 13:25 ` maobibo
2023-04-25 13:28 ` WANG Xuerui
2023-04-26 0:46 ` maobibo
2023-04-26 2:10 ` WANG Xuerui
2023-04-26 2:23 ` maobibo
2023-06-06 22:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230422082211.GA1215777@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®