[PATCH] firmware: smccc: set variables smccc_soc_id_version,revision storage-class-specifier to static

[Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>]

smatch reports
drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:20:21: warning: symbol
  'smccc_soc_id_version' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:21:21: warning: symbol
  'smccc_soc_id_revision' was not declared. Should it be static?

These variables are only used in their defining file so should be static

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c b/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
index db818f9dcb8e..0cf4c45de417 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ static enum arm_smccc_conduit smccc_conduit = SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE;
 
 bool __ro_after_init smccc_trng_available = false;
 u64 __ro_after_init smccc_has_sve_hint = false;
-s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_version = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
-s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_revision = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+static s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_version = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+static s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_revision = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
 
 void __init arm_smccc_version_init(u32 version, enum arm_smccc_conduit conduit)
 {
-- 
2.27.0