Re: [PATCH] writeback: fix call of incorrect macro

[Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>]

Hi!

Jens, can you please pickup this patch? It has fallen through the cracks.
Usually you tend to be picking up cgroup writeback stuff. Thanks!

								Honza

On Wed 12-04-23 17:31:03, Maxim Korotkov wrote:
> Hi,
> Will this patch be applied or rejected?
> best regards, Max
> 
> On 26.01.2023 16:52, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Thu 19-01-23 13:44:43, Maxim Korotkov wrote:
> > >   the variable 'history' is of type u16, it may be an error
> > >   that the hweight32 macro was used for it
> > >   I guess macro hweight16 should be used
> > > 
> > > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 2a81490811d0 ("writeback: implement foreign cgroup inode detection")
> > > Signed-off-by: Maxim Korotkov <korotkov.maxim.s@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Looks good to me, although it is mostly a theoretical issue - I don't see
> > how hweight32 could do any harm here. Anyway, feel free to add:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > 
> > 								Honza
> > 
> > > ---
> > >   fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > > index 6fba5a52127b..fc16123b2405 100644
> > > --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > > +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > > @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ void wbc_detach_inode(struct writeback_control *wbc)
> > >   		 * is okay.  The main goal is avoiding keeping an inode on
> > >   		 * the wrong wb for an extended period of time.
> > >   		 */
> > > -		if (hweight32(history) > WB_FRN_HIST_THR_SLOTS)
> > > +		if (hweight16(history) > WB_FRN_HIST_THR_SLOTS)
> > >   			inode_switch_wbs(inode, max_id);
> > >   	}
> > > -- 
> > > 2.37.2
> > > 
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR