From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: fix sifive and thead section mismatches in errata
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 10:50:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230429-exclusion-specimen-f47b03c6d859@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230429043530.20503-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2992 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 09:35:30PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> When CONFIG_MODULES is set, __init_or_module becomes <empty>, but when
> CONFIG_MODULES is not set, __init_or_module becomes __init.
> In the latter case, it causes section mismatch warnings:
>
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o: section mismatch in reference: riscv_fill_cpu_mfr_info (section: .text) -> sifive_errata_patch_func (section: .init.text)
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o: section mismatch in reference: riscv_fill_cpu_mfr_info (section: .text) -> thead_errata_patch_func (section: .init.text)
>
> It appears that CONFIG_MODULES not set is not tested very much.
I dunno if it the testing is *that* rare, because I'm not sure that the
fixes tags below are correct. I think that it is actually:
Fixes: bb3f89487fd9 ("RISC-V: hwprobe: Remove __init on probe_vendor_features()")
That was only applied on 20/04.
Cheers,
Conor.
> Fixes: a8e910168bba ("riscv: implement module alternatives")
> Fixes: a35707c3d850 ("riscv: add memory-type errata for T-Head")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
> Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> ---
> arch/riscv/errata/sifive/errata.c | 8 +++-----
> arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff -- a/arch/riscv/errata/sifive/errata.c b/arch/riscv/errata/sifive/errata.c
> --- a/arch/riscv/errata/sifive/errata.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/sifive/errata.c
> @@ -82,11 +82,9 @@ static void __init_or_module warn_miss_e
> pr_warn("----------------------------------------------------------------\n");
> }
>
> -void __init_or_module sifive_errata_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin,
> - struct alt_entry *end,
> - unsigned long archid,
> - unsigned long impid,
> - unsigned int stage)
> +void sifive_errata_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin, struct alt_entry *end,
> + unsigned long archid, unsigned long impid,
> + unsigned int stage)
> {
> struct alt_entry *alt;
> u32 cpu_req_errata;
> diff -- a/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c b/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> --- a/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> @@ -83,9 +83,9 @@ static u32 thead_errata_probe(unsigned i
> return cpu_req_errata;
> }
>
> -void __init_or_module thead_errata_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin, struct alt_entry *end,
> - unsigned long archid, unsigned long impid,
> - unsigned int stage)
> +void thead_errata_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin, struct alt_entry *end,
> + unsigned long archid, unsigned long impid,
> + unsigned int stage)
> {
> struct alt_entry *alt;
> u32 cpu_req_errata = thead_errata_probe(stage, archid, impid);
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-29 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-29 4:35 Randy Dunlap
2023-04-29 9:50 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-04-29 15:50 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230429-exclusion-specimen-f47b03c6d859@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®