From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] rcu: rcupdate.h: Add missing parentheses around macro pointer dereference
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 16:32:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230503203236.1587590-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> (raw)
linux/rcupdate.h macros use the *p parameter without parentheses, e.g.:
typeof(*p)
rather than
typeof(*(p))
The following test-case shows how it can generate confusion due to C
operator precedence being reversed compared to the expectations:
#define m(p) \
do { \
__typeof__(*p) v = 0; \
} while (0)
void fct(unsigned long long *p1)
{
m(p1 + 1); /* works */
m(1 + p1); /* broken */
}
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index dcd2cf1e8326..1565012fa47f 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -430,16 +430,16 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
#ifdef __CHECKER__
#define rcu_check_sparse(p, space) \
- ((void)(((typeof(*p) space *)p) == p))
+ ((void)(((typeof(*(p)) space *)p) == p))
#else /* #ifdef __CHECKER__ */
#define rcu_check_sparse(p, space)
#endif /* #else #ifdef __CHECKER__ */
#define __unrcu_pointer(p, local) \
({ \
- typeof(*p) *local = (typeof(*p) *__force)(p); \
+ typeof(*(p)) *local = (typeof(*(p)) *__force)(p); \
rcu_check_sparse(p, __rcu); \
- ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
+ ((typeof(*(p)) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
})
/**
* unrcu_pointer - mark a pointer as not being RCU protected
@@ -452,29 +452,29 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
#define __rcu_access_pointer(p, local, space) \
({ \
- typeof(*p) *local = (typeof(*p) *__force)READ_ONCE(p); \
+ typeof(*(p)) *local = (typeof(*(p)) *__force)READ_ONCE(p); \
rcu_check_sparse(p, space); \
- ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
+ ((typeof(*(p)) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
})
#define __rcu_dereference_check(p, local, c, space) \
({ \
/* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
- typeof(*p) *local = (typeof(*p) *__force)READ_ONCE(p); \
+ typeof(*(p)) *local = (typeof(*(p)) *__force)READ_ONCE(p); \
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!(c), "suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage"); \
rcu_check_sparse(p, space); \
- ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
+ ((typeof(*(p)) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
})
#define __rcu_dereference_protected(p, local, c, space) \
({ \
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!(c), "suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage"); \
rcu_check_sparse(p, space); \
- ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
+ ((typeof(*(p)) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
})
#define __rcu_dereference_raw(p, local) \
({ \
/* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
typeof(p) local = READ_ONCE(p); \
- ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
+ ((typeof(*(p)) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
})
#define rcu_dereference_raw(p) __rcu_dereference_raw(p, __UNIQUE_ID(rcu))
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-05-03 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-03 20:32 Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2023-05-03 20:33 ` Boqun Feng
2023-05-03 22:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-05 0:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-05 13:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-05-05 18:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-04 1:17 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230503203236.1587590-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®