mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffery Miller <jefferymiller@google.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andrew Duggan" <andrew@duggan.us>,
	"Jonathan Denose" <jdenose@chromium.org>,
	jdenose@google.com, "Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
	loic.poulain@linaro.org, benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com,
	"Andrew Duggan" <aduggan@synaptics.com>,
	"Jeffery Miller" <jefferymiller@google.com>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	"Maximilian Luz" <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
	"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - retry reading SMBus version on resume
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 19:27:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230510192731.300786-1-jefferymiller@google.com> (raw)

On resume there can be a period of time after the
preceding serio_resume -> psmouse_deactivate call
where calls to rmi_smb_get_version fail with
-ENXIO.

The call path in rmi_smb_resume is rmi_smb_resume -> rmi_smb_reset ->
rmi_smb_enable_smbus_mode -> rmi_smb_get_version where
this failure would occur.

Adding a retry loop ensures that after rmi_smb_reset returns
the following rmi_driver_resume calls in rmi_smbus_resume can
succeed.

This behavior was seen on a Lenovo T440p machine that required
a delay of approximately 7-12ms.
The retry limit of 5 is chosen to be larger than
this observed delay.

With this patch the trimmed resume logs look similar to:
```
psmouse serio1: PM: calling serio_resume+0x0/0x8c @ 5399, parent: i8042
[5399] libps2:__ps2_command:316: psmouse serio1: f5 [] - 0/00000000 []
psmouse serio1: PM: serio_resume+0x0/0x8c returned 0 after 3259 usecs
...
rmi4_smbus 0-002c: PM: calling rmi_smb_resume ... @ 5454, parent: i2c-0
...
[5454] i2c_i801:i801_check_post:414: i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: No response
smbus_result: i2c-0 a=02c f=0000 c=fd BYTE_DATA rd res=-6
rmi4_smbus 0-002c: failed to get SMBus version number!
rmi4_smbus 0-002c: sleeping to retry getting the SMBus version number
...
rmi4_smbus 0-002c: PM: rmi_smb_resume ... returned 0 after 21351 usecs
```

Signed-off-by: Jeffery Miller <jefferymiller@google.com>
---

Early boot dmesg include:
```
rmi4_smbus 0-002c: registering SMbus-connected sensor
rmi4_f01 rmi4-00.fn01: found RMI device, manufacturer: Synaptics, product: TM2722-001, fw id: 0
```

The resume order looks correct. The `psmouse serio1` resume returns
before the rmi_smb_resume is called showing the patch from
https://lore.kernel.org/all/89456fcd-a113-4c82-4b10-a9bcaefac68f@google.com/
is applied and working for that ordering.

I attempted to try to rule out some interaction between the concurrent
input resume calls for other i8042 devices.
Adding a 7ms delay after psmouse_deactivate which is called in the
preceding psmouse serio1 serio_resume function also allows
this version call to succeed.

If the rmi_smb_probe device_disable_async_suspend patch is applied
it will also avoid this issue. However the time between
the psmouse_deactivate call for serio_resume and rmi_smb_resume
was over 60ms on my test machine. This would naturally be long
enough to avoid this particular delay.


 drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
index 4bf0e1df6a4a..386e80ae141b 100644
--- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
+++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
@@ -43,15 +43,26 @@ static int rmi_smb_get_version(struct rmi_smb_xport *rmi_smb)
 {
 	struct i2c_client *client = rmi_smb->client;
 	int retval;
+	int tries = 0;
 
 	/* Check if for SMBus new version device by reading version byte. */
-	retval = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, SMB_PROTOCOL_VERSION_ADDRESS);
-	if (retval < 0) {
-		dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to get SMBus version number!\n");
-		return retval;
-	}
+	do {
+		if (tries > 0) {
+			dev_warn(&client->dev, "sleeping to retry getting the SMBus version number\n");
+			fsleep(5000);
+		}
+		retval = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client,
+				SMB_PROTOCOL_VERSION_ADDRESS);
+		if (retval >= 0)
+			return retval + 1;
 
-	return retval + 1;
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to get SMBus version number!\n");
+		/* On resume the read of the version can
+		 * momentarily return -ENXIO.
+		 * Retry to allow additional time for it to succeed.
+		 */
+	} while (retval == -ENXIO && tries++ < 5);
+	return retval;
 }
 
 /* SMB block write - wrapper over ic2_smb_write_block */
-- 
2.40.1.606.ga4b1b128d6-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2023-05-10 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-10 19:27 Jeffery Miller [this message]
2023-05-10 20:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2023-05-12 19:36   ` Jeffery Miller
2023-05-22 23:07     ` Andrew Duggan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230510192731.300786-1-jefferymiller@google.com \
    --to=jefferymiller@google.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=aduggan@synaptics.com \
    --cc=andrew@duggan.us \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jdenose@chromium.org \
    --cc=jdenose@google.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
    --cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®