From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, akiyks@gmail.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH locking/atomic 18/19] locking/atomic: Refrain from generating duplicate fallback kernel-doc
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 22:48:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230511204806.GA2298690@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230511204633.GF2296992@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:46:33PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 01:25:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:01:42PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:53:46PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > Do you have an alternative suggestion for generating the kernel-doc?
> > > > The current lack of it is problematic.
> > >
> > > I've never found a lack of kernel-doc to be a problem. And I'm very much
> > > against complicating the scripts to add it.
> >
> > I am sure that you have not recently found the lack of kernel-doc for
> > the atomic operations to be a problem, given that you wrote many of
> > these functions.
>
> Sure; but I meant in general -- I've *never* used kernel-doc. Comments I
> occasionally read, and sometimes they're not even broken either, but
> kernel-doc, nope.
>
> > OK, you mentioned concerns about documentation people nitpicking. This
> > can be dealt with. The added scripting is not that large or complex.
> >
> > > Also, there's Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> >
> > Yes, if you very carefully read that document end to end, correctly
> > interpreting it all, you will know what you need to. Of course, first
> > you have to find it. And then you must avoid any lapses while reading
> > it while under pressure. Not particularly friendly to someone trying
> > to chase a bug.
>
> It's either brief and terse or tediously long -- I vastly prefer the
> former, my brain can much better parse structure than English prose.
>
> Also, I find, pressure is never conductive to anything, except prehaps
> cooking rice and steam trains (because nothing is as delicous as a
> pressure cooked train -- oh wait).
>
> Add enough pressure and the human brain reduces to driven and can't read
Just in case it weren't clear: s/driven/drivel/
> even the most coherent of text no matter how easy to find.
>
> In such situations it's for the manager to take the pressure away and
> the engineer to think in relative peace.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-11 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-10 18:15 [PATCH locking/atomics 0/19] Add kernel-doc for more atomic operations Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:16 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 01/19] locking/atomic: Fix fetch_add_unless missing-period typo Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 02/19] locking/atomic: Add "@" before "true" and "false" for fallback templates Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 03/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc and docbook_oldnew variables for headers Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 04/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc header for arch_${atomic}_${pfx}inc${sfx}${order} Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 05/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc header for arch_${atomic}_${pfx}dec${sfx}${order} Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 06/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc header for arch_${atomic}_${pfx}andnot${sfx}${order} Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 07/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc header for arch_${atomic}_try_cmpxchg${order} Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 08/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc header for arch_${atomic}_dec_if_positive Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 09/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc header for arch_${atomic}_dec_unless_positive Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 10/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc header for arch_${atomic}_inc_unless_negative Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 11/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc header for arch_${atomic}_set_release Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 12/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc header for arch_${atomic}_read_acquire Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 13/19] locking/atomic: Script to auto-generate acquire, fence, and release headers Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 14/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc header for arch_${atomic}_${pfx}${name}${sfx}_acquire Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 15/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc header for arch_${atomic}_${pfx}${name}${sfx}_release Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 16/19] locking/atomic: Add kernel-doc header for arch_${atomic}_${pfx}${name}${sfx} Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 17/19] x86/atomic.h: Remove duplicate kernel-doc headers Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 18/19] locking/atomic: Refrain from generating duplicate fallback kernel-doc Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-11 17:10 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-11 19:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-12 13:18 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-12 16:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-12 17:03 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-12 18:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-13 2:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-13 23:58 ` Akira Yokosawa
2023-05-14 1:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-16 16:52 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-16 18:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-11 19:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-11 19:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-11 20:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-11 20:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-11 20:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-11 20:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-05-11 21:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-12 13:30 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-11 20:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-11 20:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-10 18:17 ` [PATCH locking/atomic 19/19] docs: Add atomic operations to the driver basic API documentation Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-16 21:33 ` Kees Cook
2023-05-17 10:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-22 12:30 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230511204806.GA2298690@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome