From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Daniel Bristot de Oliveira" <bristot@redhat.com>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/wait: Fix a kthread_park race with wait_woken()
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 00:31:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230511223124.GJ2296992@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230511214144.1924757-1-jstultz@google.com>
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 09:41:30PM +0000, John Stultz wrote:
> From: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
>
> kthread_park and wait_woken have a similar race that kthread_stop and
> wait_woken used to have before it was fixed in
> cb6538e740d7543cd989128625cf8cac4b471e0a. Extend that fix to also cover
cb6538e740d7 ("sched/wait: Fix a kthread race with wait_woken()")
> kthread_park.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
> ---
> This seemingly slipped by, so I wanted to resend it
> for review.
> ---
> kernel/sched/wait.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait.c b/kernel/sched/wait.c
> index 133b74730738..a9cf49da884b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
> @@ -425,9 +425,9 @@ int autoremove_wake_function(struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry, unsigned mode, i
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(autoremove_wake_function);
>
> -static inline bool is_kthread_should_stop(void)
> +static inline bool is_kthread_should_stop_or_park(void)
> {
> - return (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && kthread_should_stop();
> + return (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && (kthread_should_stop() || kthread_should_park());
> }
>
> /*
That's a bit sad; that two function calls for checking two consecutive
bits in the same word :-(
If we move this to kthread.c and write it like:
kthread = __to_kthread(current);
if (!kthread)
return false;
return test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &kthread->flags) ||
test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
Then the compiler should be able to merge the two bits in a single load
and test due to constant_test_bit() -- do check though.
> @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ long wait_woken(struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry, unsigned mode, long timeout)
> * or woken_wake_function() sees our store to current->state.
> */
> set_current_state(mode); /* A */
> - if (!(wq_entry->flags & WQ_FLAG_WOKEN) && !is_kthread_should_stop())
> + if (!(wq_entry->flags & WQ_FLAG_WOKEN) && !is_kthread_should_stop_or_park())
> timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>
> --
> 2.40.1.606.ga4b1b128d6-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-11 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 19:40 Arve Hjønnevåg
2023-05-11 21:41 ` John Stultz
2023-05-11 22:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-05-12 0:52 ` John Stultz
2023-05-12 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230511223124.GJ2296992@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®