From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] sched/nohz: Add HRTICK_BW for using cfs bandwidth with nohz_full
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 15:47:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230518134746.GB2860939@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230518132038.3534728-1-pauld@redhat.com>
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:20:38AM -0400, Phil Auld wrote:
> CFS bandwidth limits and NOHZ full don't play well together. Tasks
> can easily run well past their quotas before a remote tick does
> accounting. This leads to long, multi-period stalls before such
> tasks can run again. Use the hrtick mechanism to set a sched
> tick to fire at remaining_runtime in the future if we are on
> a nohz full cpu, if the task has quota and if we are likely to
> disable the tick (nr_running == 1). This allows for bandwidth
> accounting before tasks go too far over quota.
>
> A number of container workloads use a dynamic number of real
> nohz tasks but also have other work that is limited which ends
> up running on the "spare" nohz cpus. This is an artifact of
> having to specify nohz_full cpus at boot. Adding this hrtick
> resolves the issue of long stalls on these tasks.
>
> Add the sched_feat HRTICK_BW off by default to allow users to
> enable this only when needed.
OMG; so because NOHZ_FULL configuration sucks, we add hacks on?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-18 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-18 13:20 Phil Auld
2023-05-18 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-05-18 14:37 ` Phil Auld
2023-06-12 21:39 ` Phil Auld
2023-05-18 16:38 ` kernel test robot
2023-05-18 19:01 ` Phil Auld
2023-05-18 18:43 ` kernel test robot
2023-05-18 21:29 ` Benjamin Segall
2023-05-18 22:01 ` Phil Auld
2023-06-08 12:51 ` Phil Auld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230518134746.GB2860939@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®