From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Consider task_struct::saved_state in wait_task_inactive().
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 18:52:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230525165244.GV83892@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y++UzubyNavLKFDP@linutronix.de>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 03:53:02PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> +static __always_inline bool state_mismatch(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + bool mismatch;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
> + if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) & match_state)
> + mismatch = false;
> + else if (READ_ONCE(p->saved_state) & match_state)
> + mismatch = false;
> + else
> + mismatch = true;
> +
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
> + return mismatch;
> +}
> +static __always_inline bool state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state,
> + bool *wait)
> +{
> + if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) & match_state)
> + return true;
> + if (READ_ONCE(p->saved_state) & match_state) {
> + *wait = true;
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +#else
> +static __always_inline bool state_mismatch(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state)
> +{
> + return !(READ_ONCE(p->__state) & match_state);
> +}
> +static __always_inline bool state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state,
> + bool *wait)
> +{
> + return (READ_ONCE(p->__state) & match_state);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * wait_task_inactive - wait for a thread to unschedule.
> *
Urgh...
I've ended up with the below.. I've tried folding it with
ttwu_state_match() but every attempt so far makes it an unholy mess.
Now, if only we had proper lock guard then we could drop another few
lines, but alas.
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index a68d1276bab0..5a106629a98d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3341,6 +3341,37 @@ int migrate_swap(struct task_struct *cur, struct task_struct *p,
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
+static __always_inline
+bool __wti_state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int *queued)
+{
+ if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) & state)
+ return true;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+ if (READ_ONCE(p->saved_state) & state) {
+ if (queued)
+ *queued = 1;
+ return true;
+ }
+#endif
+ return false;
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool wti_state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+ bool match;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
+ match = __wti_state_match(p, state, NULL);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
+
+ return match;
+#else
+ return __wti_state_match(p, state, NULL);
+#endif
+}
+
/*
* wait_task_inactive - wait for a thread to unschedule.
*
@@ -3385,7 +3416,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state
* is actually now running somewhere else!
*/
while (task_on_cpu(rq, p)) {
- if (!(READ_ONCE(p->__state) & match_state))
+ if (!wti_state_match(p, match_state))
return 0;
cpu_relax();
}
@@ -3400,7 +3431,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state
running = task_on_cpu(rq, p);
queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
ncsw = 0;
- if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) & match_state)
+ if (__wti_state_match(p, match_state, &queued))
ncsw = p->nvcsw | LONG_MIN; /* sets MSB */
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-25 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-17 14:53 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-02-22 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 16:53 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-03-29 13:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-05-24 14:59 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-05-25 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-05-26 8:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-26 15:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-01 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-02 8:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-02 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-02 10:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-02 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-05 16:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-05 19:16 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-26 8:47 ` [PATCH] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230525165244.GV83892@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®