From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Thorsten Leemhuis" <linux@leemhuis.info>,
"Joan Bruguera Micó" <joanbrugueram@gmail.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
"Alyssa Ross" <hi@alyssa.is>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv/purgatory: Do not use fortified string functions
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 23:37:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230531-abruptly-settling-f9852f408dcd@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230531003404.never.167-kees@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2791 bytes --]
Hey Kees,
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 05:34:04PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> With the addition of -fstrict-flex-arrays=3, struct sha256_state's
> trailing array is no longer ignored by CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE:
>
> struct sha256_state {
> u32 state[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE / 4];
> u64 count;
> u8 buf[SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE];
> };
>
> This means that the memcpy() calls with "buf" as a destination in
> sha256.c's code will attempt to perform run-time bounds checking, which
> could lead to calling missing functions, specifically a potential
> WARN_ONCE, which isn't callable from purgatory.
>
> Reported-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/175578ec-9dec-7a9c-8d3a-43f24ff86b92@leemhuis.info/
> Bisected-by: "Joan Bruguera Micó" <joanbrugueram@gmail.com>
> Fixes: df8fc4e934c1 ("kbuild: Enable -fstrict-flex-arrays=3")
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> Cc: Alyssa Ross <hi@alyssa.is>
> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Perhaps this is indicative of other issues in RISC-V land, but
allmodconfig complains about this patch:
../lib/string.c:17: warning: "__NO_FORTIFY" redefined
../lib/string.c:17:9: warning: preprocessor token __NO_FORTIFY redefined
> ---
> arch/riscv/purgatory/Makefile | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/purgatory/Makefile b/arch/riscv/purgatory/Makefile
> index 5730797a6b40..11f4c275f141 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/purgatory/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/purgatory/Makefile
> @@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ $(obj)/strncmp.o: $(srctree)/arch/riscv/lib/strncmp.S FORCE
> $(obj)/sha256.o: $(srctree)/lib/crypto/sha256.c FORCE
> $(call if_changed_rule,cc_o_c)
>
> -CFLAGS_sha256.o := -D__DISABLE_EXPORTS
> -CFLAGS_string.o := -D__DISABLE_EXPORTS
> -CFLAGS_ctype.o := -D__DISABLE_EXPORTS
> +CFLAGS_sha256.o := -D__DISABLE_EXPORTS -D__NO_FORTIFY
> +CFLAGS_string.o := -D__DISABLE_EXPORTS -D__NO_FORTIFY
> +CFLAGS_ctype.o := -D__DISABLE_EXPORTS -D__NO_FORTIFY
>
> # When linking purgatory.ro with -r unresolved symbols are not checked,
> # also link a purgatory.chk binary without -r to check for unresolved symbols.
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-31 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-31 0:34 Kees Cook
2023-05-31 22:37 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-06-01 2:51 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230531-abruptly-settling-f9852f408dcd@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu \
--cc=hi@alyssa.is \
--cc=joanbrugueram@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@leemhuis.info \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®