From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V12 10/10] arm64/perf: Implement branch records save on PMU IRQ
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 19:02:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230615133239.442736-11-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230615133239.442736-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
This modifies armv8pmu_branch_read() to concatenate live entries along with
task context stored entries and then process the resultant buffer to create
perf branch entry array for perf_sample_data. It follows the same principle
like task sched out.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c b/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c
index 3bb17ced2b1d..d28067c896e2 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c
@@ -653,41 +653,44 @@ void armv8pmu_branch_reset(void)
isb();
}
-static bool capture_branch_entry(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc,
- struct perf_event *event, int idx)
+static void brbe_regset_branch_entries(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
+ struct brbe_regset *regset, int idx)
{
struct perf_branch_entry *entry = &cpuc->branches->branch_entries[idx];
- u64 brbinf = get_brbinf_reg(idx);
-
- /*
- * There are no valid entries anymore on the buffer.
- * Abort the branch record processing to save some
- * cycles and also reduce the capture/process load
- * for the user space as well.
- */
- if (brbe_invalid(brbinf))
- return false;
+ u64 brbinf = regset[idx].brbinf;
perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(entry);
if (brbe_record_is_complete(brbinf)) {
- entry->from = get_brbsrc_reg(idx);
- entry->to = get_brbtgt_reg(idx);
+ entry->from = regset[idx].brbsrc;
+ entry->to = regset[idx].brbtgt;
} else if (brbe_record_is_source_only(brbinf)) {
- entry->from = get_brbsrc_reg(idx);
+ entry->from = regset[idx].brbsrc;
entry->to = 0;
} else if (brbe_record_is_target_only(brbinf)) {
entry->from = 0;
- entry->to = get_brbtgt_reg(idx);
+ entry->to = regset[idx].brbtgt;
}
capture_brbe_flags(entry, event, brbinf);
- return true;
+}
+
+static void process_branch_entries(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
+ struct brbe_regset *regset, int nr_regset)
+{
+ int idx;
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < nr_regset; idx++)
+ brbe_regset_branch_entries(cpuc, event, regset, idx);
+
+ cpuc->branches->branch_stack.nr = nr_regset;
+ cpuc->branches->branch_stack.hw_idx = -1ULL;
}
void armv8pmu_branch_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
{
- int nr_hw_entries = brbe_get_numrec(cpuc->percpu_pmu->reg_brbidr);
+ struct arm64_perf_task_context *task_ctx = event->pmu_ctx->task_ctx_data;
+ struct brbe_regset live[BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES];
+ int nr_live, nr_store, nr_hw_entries;
u64 brbfcr, brbcr;
- int idx = 0;
brbcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
@@ -699,25 +702,17 @@ void armv8pmu_branch_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
write_sysreg_s(brbfcr | BRBFCR_EL1_PAUSED, SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
isb();
- /* Loop through bank 0 */
- select_brbe_bank(BRBE_BANK_IDX_0);
- while (idx < nr_hw_entries && idx < BRBE_BANK0_IDX_MAX) {
- if (!capture_branch_entry(cpuc, event, idx))
- goto skip_bank_1;
- idx++;
- }
-
- /* Loop through bank 1 */
- select_brbe_bank(BRBE_BANK_IDX_1);
- while (idx < nr_hw_entries && idx < BRBE_BANK1_IDX_MAX) {
- if (!capture_branch_entry(cpuc, event, idx))
- break;
- idx++;
+ nr_hw_entries = brbe_get_numrec(cpuc->percpu_pmu->reg_brbidr);
+ nr_live = capture_brbe_regset(nr_hw_entries, live);
+ if (event->ctx->task) {
+ nr_store = task_ctx->nr_brbe_records;
+ nr_store = stitch_stored_live_entries(task_ctx->store, live, nr_store,
+ nr_live, nr_hw_entries);
+ process_branch_entries(cpuc, event, task_ctx->store, nr_store);
+ task_ctx->nr_brbe_records = 0;
+ } else {
+ process_branch_entries(cpuc, event, live, nr_live);
}
-
-skip_bank_1:
- cpuc->branches->branch_stack.nr = idx;
- cpuc->branches->branch_stack.hw_idx = -1ULL;
process_branch_aborts(cpuc);
/* Unpause the buffer */
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-15 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-15 13:32 [PATCH V12 00/10] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-15 13:32 ` [PATCH V12 01/10] drivers: perf: arm_pmu: Add new sched_task() callback Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-15 13:32 ` [PATCH V12 02/10] arm64/perf: Add BRBE registers and fields Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-15 13:32 ` [PATCH V12 03/10] arm64/perf: Add branch stack support in struct arm_pmu Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-15 13:32 ` [PATCH V12 04/10] arm64/perf: Add branch stack support in struct pmu_hw_events Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-15 13:32 ` [PATCH V12 05/10] arm64/perf: Add branch stack support in ARMV8 PMU Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-15 23:42 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-16 1:27 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-16 9:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-19 5:45 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-19 9:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-06-22 1:52 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-16 3:41 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-15 13:32 ` [PATCH V12 06/10] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack events via FEAT_BRBE Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-15 13:32 ` [PATCH V12 07/10] arm64/perf: Add PERF_ATTACH_TASK_DATA to events with has_branch_stack() Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-16 2:38 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-19 6:28 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-15 13:32 ` [PATCH V12 08/10] arm64/perf: Add struct brbe_regset helper functions Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-21 13:15 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-22 2:07 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-15 13:32 ` [PATCH V12 09/10] arm64/perf: Implement branch records save on task sched out Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-21 13:16 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-15 13:32 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2023-06-21 13:20 ` [PATCH V12 10/10] arm64/perf: Implement branch records save on PMU IRQ Mark Rutland
2023-06-21 13:23 ` [PATCH V12 00/10] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230615133239.442736-11-anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®