From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1103EEB64D9 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 06:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230183AbjF0GVW (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 02:21:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33106 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230171AbjF0GVQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 02:21:16 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3588D1FC7; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 23:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 735B36732D; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:21:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:21:10 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Greg KH Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Damien Le Moal , Min Li , axboe@kernel.dk, willy@infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: add check that partition length needs to be aligned with block size Message-ID: <20230627062110.GA18485@lst.de> References: <20230627110918.7608-1-min15.li@samsung.com> <8ea3bdfb-f2d9-ee5e-f623-02b2b134490d@kernel.org> <20230627045924.GA16913@lst.de> <2023062753-speech-straw-f2f6@gregkh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2023062753-speech-straw-f2f6@gregkh> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 08:18:32AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > No, the lack of checks goes back all the way to when this code was > > added long before git was a thing. So I don't think a Fixes tag makes > > all that much sense here. > > Ok, then how about a normal "cc: stable@kernel.org" added to the s-o-b > area so it gets picked up for all stable trees as this is an issue that > has always been there? Yes, that sounds sensible.