From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Roman Beranek <me@crly.cz>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/8] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: consider alternative parent rates when determining rate
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2023 19:55:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230702-pll-mipi_set_rate_parent-v3-1-46dcb8aa9cbc@oltmanns.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230702-pll-mipi_set_rate_parent-v3-0-46dcb8aa9cbc@oltmanns.dev>
In case the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag is set, consider using a different
parent rate when determining a new rate.
To find the best match for the requested rate, perform the following
steps for each NKM combination:
- calculate the optimal parent rate,
- find the best parent rate that the parent clock actually supports
- use that parent rate to calculate the effective rate.
In case the clk does not support setting the parent rate, use the same
algorithm as before.
Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
index a0978a50edae..d83843e69c25 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/math.h>
#include "ccu_gate.h"
#include "ccu_nkm.h"
@@ -16,6 +17,44 @@ struct _ccu_nkm {
unsigned long m, min_m, max_m;
};
+static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best_with_parent_adj(unsigned long *parent, unsigned long rate,
+ struct _ccu_nkm *nkm, struct clk_hw *phw)
+{
+ unsigned long best_rate = 0, best_parent_rate = *parent, tmp_parent = *parent;
+ unsigned long best_n = 0, best_k = 0, best_m = 0;
+ unsigned long _n, _k, _m;
+
+ for (_k = nkm->min_k; _k <= nkm->max_k; _k++) {
+ for (_n = nkm->min_n; _n <= nkm->max_n; _n++) {
+ for (_m = nkm->min_m; _m <= nkm->max_m; _m++) {
+ unsigned long tmp_rate;
+
+ tmp_parent = clk_hw_round_rate(phw, rate * _m / (_n * _k));
+
+ tmp_rate = tmp_parent * _n * _k / _m;
+ if (tmp_rate > rate)
+ continue;
+
+ if ((rate - tmp_rate) < (rate - best_rate)) {
+ best_rate = tmp_rate;
+ best_parent_rate = tmp_parent;
+ best_n = _n;
+ best_k = _k;
+ best_m = _m;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ nkm->n = best_n;
+ nkm->k = best_k;
+ nkm->m = best_m;
+
+ *parent = best_parent_rate;
+
+ return best_rate;
+}
+
static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
struct _ccu_nkm *nkm)
{
@@ -106,7 +145,7 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
}
static unsigned long ccu_nkm_round_rate(struct ccu_mux_internal *mux,
- struct clk_hw *hw,
+ struct clk_hw *parent_hw,
unsigned long *parent_rate,
unsigned long rate,
void *data)
@@ -124,7 +163,10 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_round_rate(struct ccu_mux_internal *mux,
if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
rate *= nkm->fixed_post_div;
- rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+ if (!clk_hw_can_set_rate_parent(&nkm->common.hw))
+ rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+ else
+ rate = ccu_nkm_find_best_with_parent_adj(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm, parent_hw);
if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
rate /= nkm->fixed_post_div;
@@ -159,7 +201,7 @@ static int ccu_nkm_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
_nkm.min_m = 1;
_nkm.max_m = nkm->m.max ?: 1 << nkm->m.width;
- ccu_nkm_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+ ccu_nkm_find_best(&parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
spin_lock_irqsave(nkm->common.lock, flags);
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-02 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-02 17:55 [PATCH v3 0/8] clk: sunxi-ng: Consider alternative parent rates when determining NKM clock rate Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-02 17:55 ` Frank Oltmanns [this message]
2023-07-03 6:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: consider alternative parent rates when determining rate Maxime Ripard
2023-07-03 8:02 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-02 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: allow pll-mipi to set parent's rate Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-03 6:47 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-02 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] clk: sunxi-ng: Add feature to find closest rate Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-03 6:48 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-02 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] clk: sunxi-ng: nm: Support finding " Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-03 7:24 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-03 8:46 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-02 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: " Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-02 20:06 ` kernel test robot
2023-07-03 7:17 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-03 7:25 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-03 8:59 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-03 11:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-03 7:33 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-02 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] clk: sunxi-ng: mux: " Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-03 7:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-03 9:17 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-03 11:37 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-02 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] clk: sunxi-ng: div: " Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-03 7:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-02 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: select closest rate for pll-video0 Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-03 7:50 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-03 9:28 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-03 7:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] clk: sunxi-ng: Consider alternative parent rates when determining NKM clock rate Maxime Ripard
2023-07-03 9:36 ` Frank Oltmanns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230702-pll-mipi_set_rate_parent-v3-1-46dcb8aa9cbc@oltmanns.dev \
--to=frank@oltmanns.dev \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=me@crly.cz \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®