[PATCH 5.10 4/9] x86/kprobes: Identify far indirect JMP correctly

[Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>]

From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit a194acd316f93f3435a64de3b37dca2b5a77b338 ]

Since Grp5 far indirect JMP is FF "mod 101 r/m", it should be
(modrm & 0x38) == 0x28, and near indirect JMP is also 0x38 == 0x20.
So we can mask modrm with 0x30 and check 0x20.
This is actually what the original code does, it also doesn't care
the last bit. So the result code is same.

Thus, I think this is just a cosmetic cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/161469873475.49483.13257083019966335137.stgit@devnote2
Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 40d5c603ce8e..d03baf1f4024 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -478,8 +478,7 @@ static void set_resume_flags(struct kprobe *p, struct insn *insn)
 			p->ainsn.is_call = 1;
 			p->ainsn.is_abs_ip = 1;
 			break;
-		} else if (((opcode & 0x31) == 0x20) ||
-			   ((opcode & 0x31) == 0x21)) {
+		} else if ((opcode & 0x30) == 0x20) {
 			/*
 			 * jmp near and far, absolute indirect
 			 * ip is correct.
-- 
2.17.1