From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 6/7] net: skbuff: avoid accessing page_pool if !napi_safe when returning page
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 19:08:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230714170853.866018-9-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230714170853.866018-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Currently, pp->p.napi is always read, but the actual variable it gets
assigned to is read-only when @napi_safe is true. For the !napi_safe
cases, which yet is still a pack, it's an unneeded operation.
Moreover, it can lead to premature or even redundant page_pool
cacheline access. For example, when page_pool_is_last_frag() returns
false (with the recent frag improvements).
Thus, read it only when @napi_safe is true. This also allows moving
@napi inside the condition block itself. Constify it while we are
here, because why not.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 4de280c454e4..fc1470aab5cf 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -881,9 +881,8 @@ static void skb_clone_fraglist(struct sk_buff *skb)
bool page_pool_return_skb_page(struct page *page, bool napi_safe)
{
- struct napi_struct *napi;
+ bool allow_direct = false;
struct page_pool *pp;
- bool allow_direct;
page = compound_head(page);
@@ -903,9 +902,12 @@ bool page_pool_return_skb_page(struct page *page, bool napi_safe)
* in the same context as the consumer would run, so there's
* no possible race.
*/
- napi = READ_ONCE(pp->p.napi);
- allow_direct = napi_safe && napi &&
- READ_ONCE(napi->list_owner) == smp_processor_id();
+ if (napi_safe) {
+ const struct napi_struct *napi = READ_ONCE(pp->p.napi);
+
+ allow_direct = napi &&
+ READ_ONCE(napi->list_owner) == smp_processor_id();
+ }
/* Driver set this to memory recycling info. Reset it on recycle.
* This will *not* work for NIC using a split-page memory model.
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-14 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-14 17:08 [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/7] net: page_pool: a couple of assorted optimizations Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-14 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 1/7] net: skbuff: don't include <net/page_pool.h> to <linux/skbuff.h> Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-14 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 2/7] net: page_pool: place frag_* fields in one cacheline Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-14 17:14 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-14 18:37 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-07-18 13:50 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-26 8:13 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-07-26 10:39 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-14 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 2/7] net: page_pool: shrink &page_pool_params a tiny bit Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-14 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 3/7] net: page_pool: place frag_* fields in one cacheline Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-14 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 3/7] net: page_pool: shrink &page_pool_params a tiny bit Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-14 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 4/7] net: page_pool: don't use driver-set flags field directly Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-14 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 5/7] net: page_pool: avoid calling no-op externals when possible Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-14 17:08 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2023-07-14 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 7/7] net: skbuff: always try to recycle PP pages directly when in softirq Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-19 0:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-19 16:34 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-19 20:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-20 16:46 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-20 17:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-20 17:48 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-20 18:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-20 18:01 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-20 18:13 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-20 19:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-20 19:33 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-20 19:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-21 11:53 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-21 15:37 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-21 16:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230714170853.866018-9-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®