From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>, "Christopherson,,
Sean" <seanjc@google.com>, "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
"sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
"n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com" <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Unify TDCALL/SEAMCALL and TDVMCALL assembly
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 10:06:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230721080618.GC3630545@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a23ce8fd289141cea3a1b4f3dace221dca847238.camel@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 12:18:23AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't think it's feasible. Sean pointed out that
> kvm_vcpu_arch::regs[] do follow the "register index" hardware layout in x86 (for
> which I missed sorry), so we cannot re-order KVM part.
>
> And unfortunately RBP (5) is in middle of those registers:
>
> 0 = RAX
> 1 = RCX
> 2 = RDX
> 3 = RBX
> 4 = RSP
> 5 = RBP
> 6 = RSI
> 7 = RDI
> 8–15 represent R8–R15, respectively...
>
> Thus unless we add RBP to 'struct tdx_module_args', it's impossible to re-order
> the structure to match KVM's layout.
Adding RBP to the struct shouldn't be a problem, we'll just not use it.
Same as RSP, nobody sane would expect that to be used. If you worry
about it you can give them funny names like:
struct tdx_module_args {
unsigned long ax;
unsigned long cx;
unsigned long dx;
unsigned long bx;
unsigned long __sp_unused;
unsigned long __bp_unused;
unsigned long si;
unsigned long di;
...
};
I mean, at this point the whole thing is just 128 bytes of data anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-20 12:28 Kai Huang
2023-07-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] x86/tdx: Zero out the missing RSI in TDX_HYPERCALL macro Kai Huang
2023-07-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] x86/tdx: Skip saving output regs when SEAMCALL fails with VMFailInvalid Kai Huang
2023-07-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] x86/tdx: Make macros of TDCALLs consistent with the spec Kai Huang
2023-07-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] x86/tdx: Rename __tdx_module_call() to __tdcall() Kai Huang
2023-07-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] x86/tdx: Pass TDCALL/SEAMCALL input/output registers via a structure Kai Huang
2023-07-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] x86/tdx: Extend TDX_MODULE_CALL to support more TDCALL/SEAMCALL leafs Kai Huang
2023-07-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] x86/tdx: Make TDX_HYPERCALL asm similar to TDX_MODULE_CALL Kai Huang
2023-07-21 5:19 ` Huang, Kai
2023-07-21 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-21 11:06 ` Huang, Kai
2023-07-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] x86/tdx: Reimplement __tdx_hypercall() using TDX_MODULE_CALL asm Kai Huang
2023-07-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] x86/tdx: Remove 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' Kai Huang
2023-07-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] x86/virt/tdx: Wire up basic SEAMCALL functions Kai Huang
2023-07-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] x86/virt/tdx: Allow SEAMCALL to handle #UD and #GP Kai Huang
2023-07-20 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Unify TDCALL/SEAMCALL and TDVMCALL assembly Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-21 0:18 ` Huang, Kai
2023-07-21 8:06 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-07-21 11:02 ` Huang, Kai
2023-07-21 11:44 ` Huang, Kai
2023-07-21 12:04 ` Huang, Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230721080618.GC3630545@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome