mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: irqbypass: Convert producers/consumers single linked list to XArray
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 14:39:38 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230801143938.3d27a199.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230801115646.33990-1-likexu@tencent.com>

On Tue,  1 Aug 2023 19:56:46 +0800
Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
> 
> Replace producers/consumers linked list with XArray. There are no changes
> in functionality, but lookup performance has been improved.
> 
> The producers and consumers in current IRQ bypass manager are stored in
> simple linked lists, and a single mutex is held while traversing the lists
> and connecting a consumer to a producer (and vice versa). With this design
> and implementation, if there are a large number of KVM agents concurrently
> creating irqfds and all requesting to register their irqfds in the global
> consumers list, the global mutex contention will exponentially increase
> the avg wait latency, which is no longer tolerable in modern systems with
> a large number of CPU cores. For example:
> 
> the wait time latency to acquire the mutex in a stress test where 174000
> irqfds were created concurrently on an 2.70GHz ICX w/ 144 cores:
> 
> - avg = 117.855314 ms
> - min = 20 ns
> - max = 11428.340858 ms
> 
> To reduce latency introduced by the irq_bypass_register_consumer() in
> the above usage scenario, the data structure XArray and its normal API
> is applied to track the producers and consumers so that lookups don't
> require a linear walk since the "tokens" used to match producers and
> consumers are just kernel pointers.
> 
> Thanks to the nature of XArray (more memory-efficient, parallelisable
> and cache friendly), the latecny is significantly reduced (compared to
> list and hlist proposal) under the same environment and testing:
> 
> - avg = 314 ns
> - min = 124 ns
> - max = 47637 ns
> 
> In this conversion, the non-NULL opaque token to match between producer
> and consumer () is used as the XArray index. The list_for_each_entry() is
> replaced by xa_load(), and list_add/del() is replaced by xa_store/erase().
> The list_head member for linked list is removed, along with comments.
> 
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Yong He <alexyonghe@tencent.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217379
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
> ---
> Prerequisite:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230801085408.69597-1-likexu@tencent.com

Perhaps send it as a series?

> Test Requests:
> - Please rant to me if it causes a negative impact on vdpa/vfio testing.
>  include/linux/irqbypass.h |   8 +--
>  virt/lib/irqbypass.c      | 123 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqbypass.h b/include/linux/irqbypass.h
> index 9bdb2a781841..dbcc1b4d0ccf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqbypass.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqbypass.h
> @@ -8,14 +8,12 @@
>  #ifndef IRQBYPASS_H
>  #define IRQBYPASS_H
>  
> -#include <linux/list.h>
> -
>  struct irq_bypass_consumer;
>  
>  /*
>   * Theory of operation
>   *
> - * The IRQ bypass manager is a simple set of lists and callbacks that allows
> + * The IRQ bypass manager is a simple set of xarrays and callbacks that allows
>   * IRQ producers (ex. physical interrupt sources) to be matched to IRQ
>   * consumers (ex. virtualization hardware that allows IRQ bypass or offload)
>   * via a shared token (ex. eventfd_ctx).  Producers and consumers register
> @@ -30,7 +28,6 @@ struct irq_bypass_consumer;
>  
>  /**
>   * struct irq_bypass_producer - IRQ bypass producer definition
> - * @node: IRQ bypass manager private list management
>   * @token: opaque token to match between producer and consumer (non-NULL)
>   * @irq: Linux IRQ number for the producer device
>   * @add_consumer: Connect the IRQ producer to an IRQ consumer (optional)
> @@ -43,7 +40,6 @@ struct irq_bypass_consumer;
>   * for a physical device assigned to a VM.
>   */
>  struct irq_bypass_producer {
> -	struct list_head node;
>  	void *token;
>  	int irq;
>  	int (*add_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *,
> @@ -56,7 +52,6 @@ struct irq_bypass_producer {
>  
>  /**
>   * struct irq_bypass_consumer - IRQ bypass consumer definition
> - * @node: IRQ bypass manager private list management
>   * @token: opaque token to match between producer and consumer (non-NULL)
>   * @add_producer: Connect the IRQ consumer to an IRQ producer
>   * @del_producer: Disconnect the IRQ consumer from an IRQ producer
> @@ -69,7 +64,6 @@ struct irq_bypass_producer {
>   * portions of the interrupt handling to the VM.
>   */
>  struct irq_bypass_consumer {
> -	struct list_head node;
>  	void *token;
>  	int (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *,
>  			    struct irq_bypass_producer *);
> diff --git a/virt/lib/irqbypass.c b/virt/lib/irqbypass.c
> index e0aabbbf27ec..78238c0fa83f 100644
> --- a/virt/lib/irqbypass.c
> +++ b/virt/lib/irqbypass.c
> @@ -15,15 +15,15 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/irqbypass.h>
> -#include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/xarray.h>
>  
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IRQ bypass manager utility module");
>  
> -static LIST_HEAD(producers);
> -static LIST_HEAD(consumers);
> +static DEFINE_XARRAY(producers);
> +static DEFINE_XARRAY(consumers);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
>  
>  /* @lock must be held when calling connect */
> @@ -78,11 +78,12 @@ static void __disconnect(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod,
>   * irq_bypass_register_producer - register IRQ bypass producer
>   * @producer: pointer to producer structure
>   *
> - * Add the provided IRQ producer to the list of producers and connect
> - * with any matching token found on the IRQ consumers list.
> + * Add the provided IRQ producer to the xarray of producers and connect
> + * with any matching token found on the IRQ consumers xarray.
>   */
>  int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct irq_bypass_producer *producer)
>  {
> +	unsigned long token = (unsigned long)producer->token;
>  	struct irq_bypass_producer *tmp;
>  	struct irq_bypass_consumer *consumer;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -97,23 +98,22 @@ int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct irq_bypass_producer *producer)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&lock);
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &producers, node) {
> -		if (tmp->token == producer->token || tmp == producer) {
> -			ret = -EBUSY;
> +	tmp = xa_load(&producers, token);
> +	if (tmp || tmp == producer) {
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out_err;
> +	}
> +
> +	consumer = xa_load(&consumers, token);
> +	if (consumer) {
> +		ret = __connect(producer, consumer);
> +		if (ret)
>  			goto out_err;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(consumer, &consumers, node) {
> -		if (consumer->token == producer->token) {
> -			ret = __connect(producer, consumer);
> -			if (ret)
> -				goto out_err;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	list_add(&producer->node, &producers);
> +	ret = xa_err(xa_store(&producers, token, producer, GFP_KERNEL));
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_err;


This leaves the producer and consumer connected but not tracked in the
producers xarray.

>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&lock);
>  
> @@ -129,11 +129,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_bypass_register_producer);
>   * irq_bypass_unregister_producer - unregister IRQ bypass producer
>   * @producer: pointer to producer structure
>   *
> - * Remove a previously registered IRQ producer from the list of producers
> + * Remove a previously registered IRQ producer from the xarray of producers
>   * and disconnect it from any connected IRQ consumer.
>   */
>  void irq_bypass_unregister_producer(struct irq_bypass_producer *producer)
>  {
> +	unsigned long token = (unsigned long)producer->token;
>  	struct irq_bypass_producer *tmp;
>  	struct irq_bypass_consumer *consumer;
>  
> @@ -143,24 +144,18 @@ void irq_bypass_unregister_producer(struct irq_bypass_producer *producer)
>  	might_sleep();
>  
>  	if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
> -		return; /* nothing in the list anyway */
> +		return; /* nothing in the xarray anyway */
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&lock);
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &producers, node) {
> -		if (tmp != producer)
> -			continue;
> +	tmp = xa_load(&producers, token);
> +	if (tmp == producer) {
> +		consumer = xa_load(&consumers, token);
> +		if (consumer)
> +			__disconnect(producer, consumer);
>  
> -		list_for_each_entry(consumer, &consumers, node) {
> -			if (consumer->token == producer->token) {
> -				__disconnect(producer, consumer);
> -				break;
> -			}
> -		}
> -
> -		list_del(&producer->node);
> +		xa_erase(&producers, token);
>  		module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> -		break;
>  	}
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&lock);
> @@ -173,11 +168,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_bypass_unregister_producer);
>   * irq_bypass_register_consumer - register IRQ bypass consumer
>   * @consumer: pointer to consumer structure
>   *
> - * Add the provided IRQ consumer to the list of consumers and connect
> - * with any matching token found on the IRQ producer list.
> + * Add the provided IRQ consumer to the xarray of consumers and connect
> + * with any matching token found on the IRQ producer xarray.
>   */
>  int irq_bypass_register_consumer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *consumer)
>  {
> +	unsigned long token = (unsigned long)consumer->token;
>  	struct irq_bypass_consumer *tmp;
>  	struct irq_bypass_producer *producer;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -193,23 +189,22 @@ int irq_bypass_register_consumer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *consumer)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&lock);
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &consumers, node) {
> -		if (tmp->token == consumer->token || tmp == consumer) {
> -			ret = -EBUSY;
> +	tmp = xa_load(&consumers, token);
> +	if (tmp || tmp == consumer) {
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out_err;
> +	}
> +
> +	producer = xa_load(&producers, token);
> +	if (producer) {
> +		ret = __connect(producer, consumer);
> +		if (ret)
>  			goto out_err;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(producer, &producers, node) {
> -		if (producer->token == consumer->token) {
> -			ret = __connect(producer, consumer);
> -			if (ret)
> -				goto out_err;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	list_add(&consumer->node, &consumers);
> +	ret = xa_err(xa_store(&consumers, token, consumer, GFP_KERNEL));
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_err;

Same as above.  Thanks,

Alex

>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&lock);
>  
> @@ -225,11 +220,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_bypass_register_consumer);
>   * irq_bypass_unregister_consumer - unregister IRQ bypass consumer
>   * @consumer: pointer to consumer structure
>   *
> - * Remove a previously registered IRQ consumer from the list of consumers
> + * Remove a previously registered IRQ consumer from the xarray of consumers
>   * and disconnect it from any connected IRQ producer.
>   */
>  void irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *consumer)
>  {
> +	unsigned long token = (unsigned long)consumer->token;
>  	struct irq_bypass_consumer *tmp;
>  	struct irq_bypass_producer *producer;
>  
> @@ -239,24 +235,18 @@ void irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *consumer)
>  	might_sleep();
>  
>  	if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
> -		return; /* nothing in the list anyway */
> +		return; /* nothing in the xarray anyway */
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&lock);
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &consumers, node) {
> -		if (tmp != consumer)
> -			continue;
> +	tmp = xa_load(&consumers, token);
> +	if (tmp == consumer) {
> +		producer = xa_load(&producers, token);
> +		if (producer)
> +			__disconnect(producer, consumer);
>  
> -		list_for_each_entry(producer, &producers, node) {
> -			if (producer->token == consumer->token) {
> -				__disconnect(producer, consumer);
> -				break;
> -			}
> -		}
> -
> -		list_del(&consumer->node);
> +		xa_erase(&consumers, token);
>  		module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> -		break;
>  	}
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&lock);
> @@ -264,3 +254,10 @@ void irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *consumer)
>  	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_bypass_unregister_consumer);
> +
> +static void __exit irqbypass_exit(void)
> +{
> +	xa_destroy(&producers);
> +	xa_destroy(&consumers);
> +}
> +module_exit(irqbypass_exit);
> 
> base-commit: b580148824057ef8e3cc3a459082ebcb99716880


      reply	other threads:[~2023-08-01 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-01 11:56 Like Xu
2023-08-01 20:39 ` Alex Williamson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230801143938.3d27a199.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®