From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CB9C04A94 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 07:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234146AbjHDHTR (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2023 03:19:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60034 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231236AbjHDHTO (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2023 03:19:14 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3646D35A4 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 00:19:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1691133553; x=1722669553; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=BDuVT36s7rZhAHeXZPbnbKNVyVqHUNqlGW4Nm9uSNYM=; b=aG2WEULvsqOTamEEPWMbH5JqH05phEk79t7s83ZJji/xwuem+WMt5Q2c PrmoEZXJDYWmWIaSoCONbZ3QBgYl9KGiGDxmV1fzEm3GWtCJWfuBJPEzF TCUsgxyRmIZxVIG0ZRgBBDXtVFW6R/V4Fg+22BLY6D8IZo5Yr5T7goD7i FVeO3rZAYh7334O0Yl9XkhS7SXy5iIvYtXCixB8yjLc4C9+efNbbAsFz2 j8OreQFtUhvtEDe6F1+jUHb/cKt1s2mgky/X86Pog2eU5vPgO+t4sT5VK pDYjqMSDmPoXwTGuILWwarSsmhx45UY6DYui1k9NuVWKz5lhCR908vSPO Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10791"; a="373737467" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,254,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="373737467" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Aug 2023 00:19:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10791"; a="759451252" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,254,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="759451252" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d1ccc7e87e8f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2023 00:19:08 -0700 Received: from kbuild by d1ccc7e87e8f with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qRp5X-0002ij-2o; Fri, 04 Aug 2023 07:19:07 +0000 Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 15:18:13 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , chunkuang.hu@kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, ehristev@collabora.com, wenst@chromium.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, kernel@collabora.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 07/16] drm/mediatek: aal: Use bitfield macros Message-ID: <202308041431.xXkaXQ8u-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230803110214.163645-8-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230803110214.163645-8-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi AngeloGioacchino, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on drm-misc/drm-misc-next] [also build test ERROR on pza/reset/next] [cannot apply to pza/imx-drm/next mbgg-mediatek/for-next] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/AngeloGioacchino-Del-Regno/drm-mediatek-gamma-Adjust-mtk_drm_gamma_set_common-parameters/20230803-190918 base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230803110214.163645-8-angelogioacchino.delregno%40collabora.com patch subject: [PATCH v9 07/16] drm/mediatek: aal: Use bitfield macros config: arm-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230804/202308041431.xXkaXQ8u-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230804/202308041431.xXkaXQ8u-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308041431.xXkaXQ8u-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c: In function 'mtk_aal_config': >> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:63:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_PREP' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 63 | sz = FIELD_PREP(DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_HSIZE, w); | ^~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:63:25: error: 'DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_HSIZE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DISP_AAL_SIZE_HSIZE'? 63 | sz = FIELD_PREP(DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_HSIZE, w); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | DISP_AAL_SIZE_HSIZE drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:63:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:64:26: error: 'DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_VSIZE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DISP_AAL_SIZE_VSIZE'? 64 | sz |= FIELD_PREP(DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_VSIZE, h); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | DISP_AAL_SIZE_VSIZE cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/FIELD_PREP +63 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c 55 56 void mtk_aal_config(struct device *dev, unsigned int w, 57 unsigned int h, unsigned int vrefresh, 58 unsigned int bpc, struct cmdq_pkt *cmdq_pkt) 59 { 60 struct mtk_disp_aal *aal = dev_get_drvdata(dev); 61 u32 sz; 62 > 63 sz = FIELD_PREP(DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_HSIZE, w); 64 sz |= FIELD_PREP(DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_VSIZE, h); 65 66 mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, sz, &aal->cmdq_reg, aal->regs, DISP_AAL_SIZE); 67 mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, sz, &aal->cmdq_reg, aal->regs, DISP_AAL_OUTPUT_SIZE); 68 } 69 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki