mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>,
	Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
	Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 4/6] net: skbuff: avoid accessing page_pool if !napi_safe when returning page
Date: Fri,  4 Aug 2023 20:05:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230804180529.2483231-5-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230804180529.2483231-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>

Currently, pp->p.napi is always read, but the actual variable it gets
assigned to is read-only when @napi_safe is true. For the !napi_safe
cases, which yet is still a pack, it's an unneeded operation.
Moreover, it can lead to premature or even redundant page_pool
cacheline access. For example, when page_pool_is_last_frag() returns
false (with the recent frag improvements).
Thus, read it only when @napi_safe is true. This also allows moving
@napi inside the condition block itself. Constify it while we are
here, because why not.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index acc5844a0de1..85f82a6a08dc 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -882,9 +882,8 @@ static void skb_clone_fraglist(struct sk_buff *skb)
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_POOL)
 bool napi_pp_put_page(struct page *page, bool napi_safe)
 {
-	struct napi_struct *napi;
+	bool allow_direct = false;
 	struct page_pool *pp;
-	bool allow_direct;
 
 	page = compound_head(page);
 
@@ -904,9 +903,12 @@ bool napi_pp_put_page(struct page *page, bool napi_safe)
 	 * in the same context as the consumer would run, so there's
 	 * no possible race.
 	 */
-	napi = READ_ONCE(pp->p.napi);
-	allow_direct = napi_safe && napi &&
-		READ_ONCE(napi->list_owner) == smp_processor_id();
+	if (napi_safe) {
+		const struct napi_struct *napi = READ_ONCE(pp->p.napi);
+
+		allow_direct = napi &&
+			READ_ONCE(napi->list_owner) == smp_processor_id();
+	}
 
 	/* Driver set this to memory recycling info. Reset it on recycle.
 	 * This will *not* work for NIC using a split-page memory model.
-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-04 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-04 18:05 [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] page_pool: a couple of assorted optimizations Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-04 18:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] page_pool: split types and declarations from page_pool.h Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-07 20:09   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-04 18:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] net: skbuff: don't include <net/page_pool/types.h> to <linux/skbuff.h> Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-04 18:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] page_pool: place frag_* fields in one cacheline Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-04 18:05 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2023-08-04 18:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/6] page_pool: add a lockdep check for recycling in hardirq Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-07 14:48   ` Alexander H Duyck
2023-08-08 13:16     ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-08 13:45       ` Alexander Duyck
2023-08-08 13:58         ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-08 14:52           ` Alexander Duyck
2023-08-08 15:06             ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-08 17:35               ` Alexander Duyck
2023-08-04 18:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/6] net: skbuff: always try to recycle PP pages directly when in softirq Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-07 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] page_pool: a couple of assorted optimizations Alexander H Duyck
2023-08-07 20:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-08-08 13:17   ` Alexander Lobakin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230804180529.2483231-5-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®