From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 4/6] net: skbuff: avoid accessing page_pool if !napi_safe when returning page
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 20:05:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230804180529.2483231-5-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230804180529.2483231-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Currently, pp->p.napi is always read, but the actual variable it gets
assigned to is read-only when @napi_safe is true. For the !napi_safe
cases, which yet is still a pack, it's an unneeded operation.
Moreover, it can lead to premature or even redundant page_pool
cacheline access. For example, when page_pool_is_last_frag() returns
false (with the recent frag improvements).
Thus, read it only when @napi_safe is true. This also allows moving
@napi inside the condition block itself. Constify it while we are
here, because why not.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index acc5844a0de1..85f82a6a08dc 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -882,9 +882,8 @@ static void skb_clone_fraglist(struct sk_buff *skb)
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_POOL)
bool napi_pp_put_page(struct page *page, bool napi_safe)
{
- struct napi_struct *napi;
+ bool allow_direct = false;
struct page_pool *pp;
- bool allow_direct;
page = compound_head(page);
@@ -904,9 +903,12 @@ bool napi_pp_put_page(struct page *page, bool napi_safe)
* in the same context as the consumer would run, so there's
* no possible race.
*/
- napi = READ_ONCE(pp->p.napi);
- allow_direct = napi_safe && napi &&
- READ_ONCE(napi->list_owner) == smp_processor_id();
+ if (napi_safe) {
+ const struct napi_struct *napi = READ_ONCE(pp->p.napi);
+
+ allow_direct = napi &&
+ READ_ONCE(napi->list_owner) == smp_processor_id();
+ }
/* Driver set this to memory recycling info. Reset it on recycle.
* This will *not* work for NIC using a split-page memory model.
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-04 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-04 18:05 [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] page_pool: a couple of assorted optimizations Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-04 18:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] page_pool: split types and declarations from page_pool.h Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-07 20:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-04 18:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] net: skbuff: don't include <net/page_pool/types.h> to <linux/skbuff.h> Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-04 18:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] page_pool: place frag_* fields in one cacheline Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-04 18:05 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2023-08-04 18:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/6] page_pool: add a lockdep check for recycling in hardirq Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-07 14:48 ` Alexander H Duyck
2023-08-08 13:16 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-08 13:45 ` Alexander Duyck
2023-08-08 13:58 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-08 14:52 ` Alexander Duyck
2023-08-08 15:06 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-08 17:35 ` Alexander Duyck
2023-08-04 18:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/6] net: skbuff: always try to recycle PP pages directly when in softirq Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-07 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] page_pool: a couple of assorted optimizations Alexander H Duyck
2023-08-07 20:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-08-08 13:17 ` Alexander Lobakin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230804180529.2483231-5-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®