From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] io_uring: correct check for O_TMPFILE
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 12:24:15 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230807-resolve_cached-o_tmpfile-v3-1-e49323e1ef6f@cyphar.com> (raw)
O_TMPFILE is actually __O_TMPFILE|O_DIRECTORY. This means that the old
check for whether RESOLVE_CACHED can be used would incorrectly think
that O_DIRECTORY could not be used with RESOLVE_CACHED.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.12+
Fixes: 3a81fd02045c ("io_uring: enable LOOKUP_CACHED path resolution for filename lookups")
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- drop openat2 patch, as it's already in Christian's tree
- explain __O_TMPFILE usage in io_openat_force_async comment
- v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230806-resolve_cached-o_tmpfile-v2-0-058bff24fb16@cyphar.com
Changes in v2:
- fix io_uring's io_openat_force_async as well.
- v1: <https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230806-resolve_cached-o_tmpfile-v1-1-7ba16308465e@cyphar.com>
---
io_uring/openclose.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/openclose.c b/io_uring/openclose.c
index 10ca57f5bd24..e3fae26e025d 100644
--- a/io_uring/openclose.c
+++ b/io_uring/openclose.c
@@ -35,9 +35,11 @@ static bool io_openat_force_async(struct io_open *open)
{
/*
* Don't bother trying for O_TRUNC, O_CREAT, or O_TMPFILE open,
- * it'll always -EAGAIN
+ * it'll always -EAGAIN. Note that we test for __O_TMPFILE because
+ * O_TMPFILE includes O_DIRECTORY, which isn't a flag we need to force
+ * async for.
*/
- return open->how.flags & (O_TRUNC | O_CREAT | O_TMPFILE);
+ return open->how.flags & (O_TRUNC | O_CREAT | __O_TMPFILE);
}
static int __io_openat_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
---
base-commit: 272af00d6825f19b48b9d9cfd11b1f6bdc011e2c
change-id: 20230806-resolve_cached-o_tmpfile-978cb238bd68
Best regards,
--
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-07 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-07 2:24 Aleksa Sarai [this message]
2023-08-07 18:24 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230807-resolve_cached-o_tmpfile-v3-1-e49323e1ef6f@cyphar.com \
--to=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®