From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove dead code in .change_pte() handler in x86 TDP MMU
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 16:53:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230808085306.14742-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230808085056.14644-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Remove the dead code set_spte_gfn() in x86 TDP MMU's .change_pte() handler
to save CPU cycles and to prepare for the optimization in next patch.
As explained in commit c13fda237f08 ("KVM: Assert that notifier count is
elevated in .change_pte()"),
when .change_pte() was added by commit 828502d30073 ("ksm: add mmu_notifier
set_pte_at_notify()"), .change_pte() was invoked without any surrounding
notifications;
However, since commit 6bdb913f0a70 ("mm: wrap calls to set_pte_at_notify
with invalidate_range_start and invalidate_range_end"), all calls to
.change_pte() are guaranteed to be surrounded by .invalidate_range_start()
and .invalidate_range_end() pair.
As .invalidate_range_start() will always cause KVM to zap related SPTE, and
page fault path will not install new SPTEs successfully before
.invalidate_range_end(), kvm_set_spte_gfn() should not be able to find any
shadow present leaf entries to operate on and therefore set_spte_gfn()
is never called any more.
So, in TDP MMU, just drop the set_spte_gfn() and only keep warning of huge
pages.
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 40 ++++----------------------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 6250bd3d20c1..89a1f222e823 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1235,36 +1235,6 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
return kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn(kvm, range, test_age_gfn);
}
-static bool set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
- struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
-{
- u64 new_spte;
-
- /* Huge pages aren't expected to be modified without first being zapped. */
- WARN_ON(pte_huge(range->arg.pte) || range->start + 1 != range->end);
-
- if (iter->level != PG_LEVEL_4K ||
- !is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte))
- return false;
-
- /*
- * Note, when changing a read-only SPTE, it's not strictly necessary to
- * zero the SPTE before setting the new PFN, but doing so preserves the
- * invariant that the PFN of a present * leaf SPTE can never change.
- * See handle_changed_spte().
- */
- tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, iter, 0);
-
- if (!pte_write(range->arg.pte)) {
- new_spte = kvm_mmu_changed_pte_notifier_make_spte(iter->old_spte,
- pte_pfn(range->arg.pte));
-
- tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte);
- }
-
- return true;
-}
-
/*
* Handle the changed_pte MMU notifier for the TDP MMU.
* data is a pointer to the new pte_t mapping the HVA specified by the MMU
@@ -1273,12 +1243,10 @@ static bool set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
*/
bool kvm_tdp_mmu_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
{
- /*
- * No need to handle the remote TLB flush under RCU protection, the
- * target SPTE _must_ be a leaf SPTE, i.e. cannot result in freeing a
- * shadow page. See the WARN on pfn_changed in handle_changed_spte().
- */
- return kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn(kvm, range, set_spte_gfn);
+ /* Huge pages aren't expected to be modified */
+ WARN_ON(pte_huge(range->arg.pte) || range->start + 1 != range->end);
+
+ return false;
}
/*
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-08 8:50 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86/mmu: .change_pte() optimization in " Yan Zhao
2023-08-08 8:53 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2023-08-08 8:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: prefetch SPTE directly in x86 TDP MMU's change_pte() handler Yan Zhao
2023-08-16 18:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86/mmu: .change_pte() optimization in TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2023-08-17 0:00 ` Yan Zhao
2023-08-17 17:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-18 10:17 ` Yan Zhao
2023-08-18 13:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-04 7:03 ` Yan Zhao
2023-09-05 18:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-05 19:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-06 0:29 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-06 14:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-06 16:18 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-06 16:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-08 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-09-05 20:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-06 1:51 ` Yan Zhao
2023-09-06 22:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-09-07 0:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-07 0:36 ` Yan Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230808085306.14742-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®