From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Subject: [patch V2 15/37] x86/microcode/intel: Save the microcode only after a successful late-load
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 21:58:59 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230812195728.418426203@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230812194003.682298127@linutronix.de>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
There are situations where the late microcode is loaded into memory, but is
not applied:
1) The rendevouz fails
2) The microcode is rejected by the CPUs
If any of this happens then the pointer which was updated at firmware load
time is stale and subsequent CPU hotplug operations either fail to update
or create inconsistent microcode state.
Save the loaded microcode in a separate pointer from with the late load is
attempted and when successful, update the hotplug pointer accordingly via a
new micrcode_ops callback.
Remove the pointless fallback in the loader to a microcode pointer which is
never populated.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 4 ++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -443,6 +443,10 @@ static int microcode_reload_late(void)
store_cpu_caps(&prev_info);
ret = stop_machine_cpuslocked(__reload_late, NULL, cpu_online_mask);
+
+ if (microcode_ops->finalize_late_load)
+ microcode_ops->finalize_late_load(ret);
+
if (!ret) {
pr_info("Reload succeeded, microcode revision: 0x%x -> 0x%x\n",
old, boot_cpu_data.microcode);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ static const char ucode_path[] = "kernel
/* Current microcode patch used in early patching on the APs. */
static struct microcode_intel *ucode_patch_va __read_mostly;
+static struct microcode_intel *ucode_patch_late __read_mostly;
/* last level cache size per core */
static unsigned int llc_size_per_core __ro_after_init;
@@ -541,12 +542,9 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_
if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu))
return UCODE_ERROR;
- mc = ucode_patch_va;
- if (!mc) {
- mc = uci->mc;
- if (!mc)
- return UCODE_NFOUND;
- }
+ mc = ucode_patch_late;
+ if (!mc)
+ return UCODE_NFOUND;
/*
* Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive
@@ -666,15 +664,7 @@ static enum ucode_state read_ucode_intel
if (!new_mc)
return UCODE_NFOUND;
- /* Save for CPU hotplug */
- save_microcode_patch((struct microcode_intel *)new_mc);
- uci->mc = ucode_patch_va;
-
- vfree(new_mc);
-
- pr_debug("CPU%d found a matching microcode update with version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n",
- cpu, cur_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev);
-
+ ucode_patch_late = (struct microcode_intel *)new_mc;
return UCODE_NEW;
}
@@ -731,10 +721,20 @@ static enum ucode_state request_microcod
return ret;
}
+static void finalize_late_load(int result)
+{
+ if (!result)
+ save_microcode_patch(ucode_patch_late);
+
+ vfree(ucode_patch_late);
+ ucode_patch_late = NULL;
+}
+
static struct microcode_ops microcode_intel_ops = {
.request_microcode_fw = request_microcode_fw,
.collect_cpu_info = collect_cpu_info,
.apply_microcode = apply_microcode_intel,
+ .finalize_late_load = finalize_late_load,
};
static __init void calc_llc_size_per_core(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct microcode_ops {
*/
enum ucode_state (*apply_microcode)(int cpu);
int (*collect_cpu_info)(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
+ void (*finalize_late_load)(int result);
};
extern struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[];
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-12 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-12 19:58 [patch V2 00/37] x86/microcode: Cleanup and late loading enhancements Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 01/37] x86/mm: Remove unused microcode.h include Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-13 17:26 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 02/37] x86/microcode: Hide the config knob Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-13 17:26 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-14 21:01 ` [patch V2 02/37] " Josh Triplett
2023-08-14 21:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 23:57 ` Josh Triplett
2023-08-15 8:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 03/37] x86/microcode/intel: Move microcode functions out of cpu/intel.c Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-13 17:26 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-23 12:51 ` [patch V2 03/37] " Qiuxu Zhuo
2023-08-23 17:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 04/37] x86/microcode: Include vendor headers into microcode.h Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-13 17:26 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 05/37] x86/microcode: Make reload_early_microcode() static Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-13 17:26 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 06/37] x86/microcode/intel: Rename get_datasize() since its used externally Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-13 17:26 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 07/37] x86/microcode: Move core specific defines to local header Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-13 17:26 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 08/37] x86/microcode/intel: Remove debug code Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-13 17:26 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 09/37] x86/microcode/intel: Remove pointless mutex Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-13 6:55 ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-13 9:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-13 17:26 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 10/37] x86/microcode/intel: Rip out mixed stepping support for Intel CPUs Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 11/37] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify scan_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 12/37] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify and rename generic_load_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-14 13:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 14:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 13/37] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup code further Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:58 ` [patch V2 14/37] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify early loading Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:58 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 16/37] x86/microcode/intel: Switch to kvmalloc() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 17/37] x86/microcode/intel: Unify microcode apply() functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 18/37] x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_cpu_collect_info() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 19/37] x86/microcode/intel: Reuse intel_cpu_collect_info() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 20/37] x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_find_matching_signature() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 21/37] x86/microcode/amd: Read revision from hardware in collect_cpu_info_amd() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 22/37] x86/microcode: Remove pointless apply() invocation Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 23/37] x86/microcode: Get rid of the schedule work indirection Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 24/37] x86/microcode: Clean up mc_cpu_down_prep() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 25/37] x86/microcode: Handle "nosmt" correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 26/37] x86/microcode: Clarify the late load logic Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-13 20:02 ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 27/37] x86/microcode: Sanitize __wait_for_cpus() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 28/37] x86/microcode: Add per CPU result state Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 29/37] x86/microcode: Add per CPU control field Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 30/37] x86/microcode: Provide new control functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 31/37] x86/microcode: Replace the all in one rendevouz handler Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 32/37] x86/microcode: Rendezvous and load in NMI Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 33/37] x86/microcode: Protect against instrumentation Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 34/37] x86/apic: Provide apic_force_nmi_on_cpu() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 35/37] x86/microcode: Handle "offline" CPUs correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 36/37] x86/microcode: Prepare for minimal revision check Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 19:59 ` [patch V2 37/37] x86/microcode/intel: Add a minimum required revision for late-loads Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230812195728.418426203@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®