mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: <mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<tj@kernel.org>, <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Skip cpus with no sched domain attached during NOHZ idle balance
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:14:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230814031432.GA574314@ziqianlu-dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230804090858.7605-1-rui.zhang@intel.com>

Hi Rui,

On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 05:08:58PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Problem statement
> -----------------
> When using cgroup isolated partition to isolate cpus including cpu0, it
> is observed that cpu0 is woken up frequenctly but doing nothing. This is
> not good for power efficiency.
> 
> <idle>-0     [000]   616.491602: hrtimer_cancel:       hrtimer=0xffff8e8fdf623c10
> <idle>-0     [000]   616.491608: hrtimer_start:        hrtimer=0xffff8e8fdf623c10 function=tick_sched_timer/0x0 expires=615996000000 softexpires=615996000000
> <idle>-0     [000]   616.491616: rcu_utilization:      Start context switch
> <idle>-0     [000]   616.491618: rcu_utilization:      End context switch
> <idle>-0     [000]   616.491637: tick_stop:            success=1 dependency=NONE
> <idle>-0     [000]   616.491637: hrtimer_cancel:       hrtimer=0xffff8e8fdf623c10
> <idle>-0     [000]   616.491638: hrtimer_start:        hrtimer=0xffff8e8fdf623c10 function=tick_sched_timer/0x0 expires=616420000000 softexpires=616420000000
> 
> The above pattern repeats every one or multiple ticks, results in total
> 2000+ wakeups on cpu0 in 60 seconds, when running workload on the
> cpus that are not in the isolated partition.
> 
> Rootcause
> ---------
> In NOHZ mode, an active cpu either sends an IPI or touches the idle
> cpu's polling flag to wake it up, so that the idle cpu can pull tasks
> from the busy cpu. The logic for selecting the target cpu is to use the
> first idle cpu that presents in both nohz.idle_cpus_mask and
> housekeeping_cpumask.
> 
> In the above scenario, when cpu0 is in the cgroup isolated partition,
> its sched domain is deteched, but it is still available in both of the
> above cpumasks. As a result, cpu0

I saw in nohz_balance_enter_idle(), if a cpu is isolated, it will not
set itself in nohz.idle_cpus_mask and thus should not be chosen as
ilb_cpu. I wonder what's stopping this from working?

> 1. is always selected when kicking idle load balance
> 2. is woken up from the idle loop
> 3. calls __schedule() but cannot find any task to pull because it is not
>    in any sched_domain, thus it does nothing and reenters idle.
> 
> Solution
> --------
> Fix the problem by skipping cpus with no sched domain attached during
> NOHZ idle balance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index b3e25be58e2b..ea3185a46962 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -11340,6 +11340,9 @@ static inline int find_new_ilb(void)
>  		if (ilb == smp_processor_id())
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (unlikely(on_null_domain(cpu_rq(ilb))))
> +			continue;
> +
>  		if (idle_cpu(ilb))
>  			return ilb;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-14  3:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-04  9:08 Zhang Rui
2023-08-09  7:00 ` Chen Yu
2023-08-11  8:49   ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-14  3:14 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2023-08-14  8:30   ` Zhang, Rui
2023-09-08  9:43     ` Pierre Gondois
2023-09-11 11:42       ` Aaron Lu
2023-09-11 16:23         ` Zhang, Rui
2023-09-12 14:32           ` Pierre Gondois
2023-09-14  9:23             ` Zhang, Rui
2023-09-14 14:53               ` Pierre Gondois
2023-09-20  7:24                 ` Zhang, Rui
2023-09-22 15:03                   ` Pierre Gondois
2023-11-15 20:01                   ` Vincent Guittot
2023-11-16  7:31                     ` Zhang, Rui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230814031432.GA574314@ziqianlu-dell \
    --to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®