From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: <mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<tj@kernel.org>, <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Skip cpus with no sched domain attached during NOHZ idle balance
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:14:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230814031432.GA574314@ziqianlu-dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230804090858.7605-1-rui.zhang@intel.com>
Hi Rui,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 05:08:58PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Problem statement
> -----------------
> When using cgroup isolated partition to isolate cpus including cpu0, it
> is observed that cpu0 is woken up frequenctly but doing nothing. This is
> not good for power efficiency.
>
> <idle>-0 [000] 616.491602: hrtimer_cancel: hrtimer=0xffff8e8fdf623c10
> <idle>-0 [000] 616.491608: hrtimer_start: hrtimer=0xffff8e8fdf623c10 function=tick_sched_timer/0x0 expires=615996000000 softexpires=615996000000
> <idle>-0 [000] 616.491616: rcu_utilization: Start context switch
> <idle>-0 [000] 616.491618: rcu_utilization: End context switch
> <idle>-0 [000] 616.491637: tick_stop: success=1 dependency=NONE
> <idle>-0 [000] 616.491637: hrtimer_cancel: hrtimer=0xffff8e8fdf623c10
> <idle>-0 [000] 616.491638: hrtimer_start: hrtimer=0xffff8e8fdf623c10 function=tick_sched_timer/0x0 expires=616420000000 softexpires=616420000000
>
> The above pattern repeats every one or multiple ticks, results in total
> 2000+ wakeups on cpu0 in 60 seconds, when running workload on the
> cpus that are not in the isolated partition.
>
> Rootcause
> ---------
> In NOHZ mode, an active cpu either sends an IPI or touches the idle
> cpu's polling flag to wake it up, so that the idle cpu can pull tasks
> from the busy cpu. The logic for selecting the target cpu is to use the
> first idle cpu that presents in both nohz.idle_cpus_mask and
> housekeeping_cpumask.
>
> In the above scenario, when cpu0 is in the cgroup isolated partition,
> its sched domain is deteched, but it is still available in both of the
> above cpumasks. As a result, cpu0
I saw in nohz_balance_enter_idle(), if a cpu is isolated, it will not
set itself in nohz.idle_cpus_mask and thus should not be chosen as
ilb_cpu. I wonder what's stopping this from working?
> 1. is always selected when kicking idle load balance
> 2. is woken up from the idle loop
> 3. calls __schedule() but cannot find any task to pull because it is not
> in any sched_domain, thus it does nothing and reenters idle.
>
> Solution
> --------
> Fix the problem by skipping cpus with no sched domain attached during
> NOHZ idle balance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index b3e25be58e2b..ea3185a46962 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -11340,6 +11340,9 @@ static inline int find_new_ilb(void)
> if (ilb == smp_processor_id())
> continue;
>
> + if (unlikely(on_null_domain(cpu_rq(ilb))))
> + continue;
> +
> if (idle_cpu(ilb))
> return ilb;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-14 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-04 9:08 Zhang Rui
2023-08-09 7:00 ` Chen Yu
2023-08-11 8:49 ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-14 3:14 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2023-08-14 8:30 ` Zhang, Rui
2023-09-08 9:43 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-09-11 11:42 ` Aaron Lu
2023-09-11 16:23 ` Zhang, Rui
2023-09-12 14:32 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-09-14 9:23 ` Zhang, Rui
2023-09-14 14:53 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-09-20 7:24 ` Zhang, Rui
2023-09-22 15:03 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-11-15 20:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2023-11-16 7:31 ` Zhang, Rui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230814031432.GA574314@ziqianlu-dell \
--to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®