From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dennis@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, cl@linux.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, shakeelb@google.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fork: group allocation of per-cpu counters for mm struct
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 22:28:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230821202829.2163744-3-mjguzik@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230821202829.2163744-1-mjguzik@gmail.com>
A trivial execve scalability test which tries to be very friendly
(statically linked binaries, all separate) is predominantly bottlenecked
by back-to-back per-cpu counter allocations which serialize on global
locks.
Ease the pain by allocating and freeing them in one go.
Bench can be found here:
http://apollo.backplane.com/DFlyMisc/doexec.c
$ cc -static -O2 -o static-doexec doexec.c
$ ./static-doexec $(nproc)
Even at a very modest scale of 26 cores (ops/s):
before: 133543.63
after: 186061.81 (+39%)
While with the patch these allocations remain a significant problem,
the primary bottleneck shifts to:
__pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+1
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+57
folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+91
release_pages+590
tlb_batch_pages_flush+61
tlb_finish_mmu+101
exit_mmap+327
__mmput+61
begin_new_exec+1245
load_elf_binary+712
bprm_execve+644
do_execveat_common.isra.0+429
__x64_sys_execve+50
do_syscall_64+46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+110
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---
kernel/fork.c | 13 +++----------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index d2e12b6d2b18..86ff78e001c1 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -909,8 +909,6 @@ static void cleanup_lazy_tlbs(struct mm_struct *mm)
*/
void __mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- int i;
-
BUG_ON(mm == &init_mm);
WARN_ON_ONCE(mm == current->mm);
@@ -925,9 +923,8 @@ void __mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm)
put_user_ns(mm->user_ns);
mm_pasid_drop(mm);
mm_destroy_cid(mm);
+ percpu_counter_destroy_many(mm->rss_stat, NR_MM_COUNTERS);
- for (i = 0; i < NR_MM_COUNTERS; i++)
- percpu_counter_destroy(&mm->rss_stat[i]);
free_mm(mm);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__mmdrop);
@@ -1252,7 +1249,6 @@ static void mm_init_uprobes_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
struct user_namespace *user_ns)
{
- int i;
mt_init_flags(&mm->mm_mt, MM_MT_FLAGS);
mt_set_external_lock(&mm->mm_mt, &mm->mmap_lock);
@@ -1301,17 +1297,14 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
if (mm_alloc_cid(mm))
goto fail_cid;
- for (i = 0; i < NR_MM_COUNTERS; i++)
- if (percpu_counter_init(&mm->rss_stat[i], 0, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT))
- goto fail_pcpu;
+ if (percpu_counter_init_many(mm->rss_stat, 0, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT, NR_MM_COUNTERS))
+ goto fail_pcpu;
mm->user_ns = get_user_ns(user_ns);
lru_gen_init_mm(mm);
return mm;
fail_pcpu:
- while (i > 0)
- percpu_counter_destroy(&mm->rss_stat[--i]);
mm_destroy_cid(mm);
fail_cid:
destroy_context(mm);
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-21 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-21 20:28 [PATCH 0/2] execve scalability issues, part 1 Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-21 20:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] pcpcntr: add group allocation/free Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-22 13:37 ` Vegard Nossum
2023-08-22 14:06 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-22 17:02 ` Dennis Zhou
2023-08-21 20:28 ` Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2023-08-21 21:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] fork: group allocation of per-cpu counters for mm struct Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-21 20:42 ` [PATCH 0/2] execve scalability issues, part 1 Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-21 20:44 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: Make folios_put() the basis of release_pages() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2023-08-21 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm: Convert free_unref_page_list() to use folios Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2023-08-21 20:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm: Add free_unref_folios() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2023-08-21 20:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm: Use folios_put() in __folio_batch_release() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2023-08-21 20:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] memcg: Add mem_cgroup_uncharge_batch() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2023-08-21 20:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm: Remove use of folio list from folios_put() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2023-08-21 20:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm: Use free_unref_folios() in put_pages_list() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2023-08-21 21:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] execve scalability issues, part 1 Dennis Zhou
2023-08-21 21:39 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-21 22:29 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-22 9:51 ` Jan Kara
2023-08-22 14:24 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-23 9:49 ` Jan Kara
2023-08-23 10:49 ` David Laight
2023-08-23 12:01 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-23 12:13 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-23 15:47 ` Jan Kara
2023-08-23 16:10 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-23 16:41 ` Jan Kara
2023-08-23 17:12 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-23 20:27 ` Dennis Zhou
2023-08-24 9:19 ` Jan Kara
2023-08-26 18:33 ` Mateusz Guzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230821202829.2163744-3-mjguzik@gmail.com \
--to=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome