From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
bristot@kernel.org, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] sched/fair: Fair server interface
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 10:01:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309010917.ryl6BbIf-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db775d65b18ddac4a75faad6761c6c2abf3efb78.1693510979.git.bristot@kernel.org>
Hi Daniel,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on tip/sched/core]
[also build test WARNING on tip/master linus/master next-20230831]
[cannot apply to tip/auto-latest v6.5]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Daniel-Bristot-de-Oliveira/sched-Unify-runtime-accounting-across-classes/20230901-043307
base: tip/sched/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/db775d65b18ddac4a75faad6761c6c2abf3efb78.1693510979.git.bristot%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH v4 7/7] sched/fair: Fair server interface
config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010917.ryl6BbIf-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010917.ryl6BbIf-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010917.ryl6BbIf-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/sched/build_utility.c:73:
>> kernel/sched/debug.c:386:56: warning: integer overflow in expression of type 'long int' results in '-100663296' [-Woverflow]
386 | static unsigned int fair_server_period_max = (1 << 22) * NSEC_PER_USEC; /* ~4 seconds */
| ^
>> kernel/sched/debug.c:491:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'debugfs_fair_server_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
491 | void debugfs_fair_server_init(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +386 kernel/sched/debug.c
385
> 386 static unsigned int fair_server_period_max = (1 << 22) * NSEC_PER_USEC; /* ~4 seconds */
387 static unsigned int fair_server_period_min = (100) * NSEC_PER_USEC; /* 100 us */
388
389 static ssize_t
390 sched_fair_server_period_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
391 size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos)
392 {
393 long cpu = (long) ((struct seq_file *) filp->private_data)->private;
394 struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
395 unsigned long flags;
396 u64 period;
397 int err;
398
399 err = kstrtoull_from_user(ubuf, cnt, 10, &period);
400 if (err)
401 return err;
402
403 if (period < fair_server_period_min || period > fair_server_period_max)
404 return -EINVAL;
405
406 raw_spin_rq_lock_irqsave(rq, flags);
407 if (period < rq->fair_server.dl_runtime)
408 err = -EINVAL;
409 else
410 rq->fair_server.dl_period = period;
411 raw_spin_rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, flags);
412
413 if (err)
414 return err;
415
416 *ppos += cnt;
417 return cnt;
418 }
419
420 static int sched_fair_server_period_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
421 {
422 unsigned long cpu = (unsigned long) m->private;
423 struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
424
425 seq_printf(m, "%llu\n", rq->fair_server.dl_period);
426 return 0;
427 }
428
429 static int sched_fair_server_period_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
430 {
431 return single_open(filp, sched_fair_server_period_show, inode->i_private);
432 }
433
434 static const struct file_operations fair_server_period_fops = {
435 .open = sched_fair_server_period_open,
436 .write = sched_fair_server_period_write,
437 .read = seq_read,
438 .llseek = seq_lseek,
439 .release = single_release,
440 };
441
442 static ssize_t
443 sched_fair_server_defer_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
444 size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos)
445 {
446 long cpu = (long) ((struct seq_file *) filp->private_data)->private;
447 struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
448 unsigned long flags;
449 u64 defer;
450 int err;
451
452 err = kstrtoull_from_user(ubuf, cnt, 10, &defer);
453 if (err)
454 return err;
455
456 if (defer < 0 || defer > 1)
457 return -EINVAL;
458
459 raw_spin_rq_lock_irqsave(rq, flags);
460 rq->fair_server_defer = defer;
461 raw_spin_rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, flags);
462
463 *ppos += cnt;
464 return cnt;
465 }
466
467 static int sched_fair_server_defer_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
468 {
469 unsigned long cpu = (unsigned long) m->private;
470 struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
471
472 seq_printf(m, "%d\n", rq->fair_server_defer);
473 return 0;
474 }
475
476 static int sched_fair_server_defer_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
477 {
478 return single_open(filp, sched_fair_server_defer_show, inode->i_private);
479 }
480
481 static const struct file_operations fair_server_defer_fops = {
482 .open = sched_fair_server_defer_open,
483 .write = sched_fair_server_defer_write,
484 .read = seq_read,
485 .llseek = seq_lseek,
486 .release = single_release,
487 };
488
489 static struct dentry *debugfs_sched;
490
> 491 void debugfs_fair_server_init(void)
492 {
493 long cpu;
494 struct dentry *rq_dentry;
495
496 rq_dentry = debugfs_create_dir("rq", debugfs_sched);
497 if (!rq_dentry)
498 return;
499
500 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
501 struct dentry *d_cpu;
502 char buf[32];
503
504 snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "cpu%ld", cpu);
505 d_cpu = debugfs_create_dir(buf, rq_dentry);
506
507 debugfs_create_file("fair_server_runtime", 0644, d_cpu, (void *) cpu, &fair_server_runtime_fops);
508 debugfs_create_file("fair_server_period", 0644, d_cpu, (void *) cpu, &fair_server_period_fops);
509 debugfs_create_file("fair_server_defer", 0644, d_cpu, (void *) cpu, &fair_server_defer_fops);
510 }
511 }
512
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-01 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-31 20:28 [PATCH v4 0/7] SCHED_DEADLINE server infrastructure Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-08-31 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] sched: Unify runtime accounting across classes Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-09-15 21:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-31 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] sched/deadline: Collect sched_dl_entity initialization Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-08-31 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] sched/deadline: Move bandwidth accounting into {en,de}queue_dl_entity Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-08-31 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] sched/deadline: Introduce deadline servers Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-08-31 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] sched/fair: Add trivial fair server Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-08-31 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] sched/deadline: Deferrable dl server Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-09-05 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-05 15:24 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-09-06 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-06 14:58 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-09-06 20:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-06 20:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-08 14:14 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-09-08 13:59 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-09-07 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-08 15:28 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-09-08 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-31 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] sched/fair: Fair server interface Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-09-01 2:01 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-09-05 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-05 16:17 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-09-06 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-06 8:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202309010917.ryl6BbIf-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=bristot@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome