From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com, acme@kernel.org
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>,
Haixin Yu <yuhaixin.yhx@linux.alibaba.com>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] perf pmus: Simplify perf_pmus__find_core_pmu()
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 16:33:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230913153355.138331-3-james.clark@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230913153355.138331-1-james.clark@arm.com>
Currently the while loop always either exits on the first iteration with
a core PMU, or exits with NULL on heterogeneous systems or when not all
CPUs are online.
Both of the latter behaviors are undesirable for platforms other than
Arm so simplify it to always return the first core PMU, or NULL if none
exist.
This behavior was depended on by the Arm version of
pmu_metrics_table__find(), so the logic has been moved there instead.
Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
---
tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c | 8 +++++++-
tools/perf/util/pmus.c | 14 +-------------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
index 3d9330feebd2..3099f5f448ba 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
@@ -10,8 +10,14 @@
const struct pmu_metrics_table *pmu_metrics_table__find(void)
{
- struct perf_pmu *pmu = perf_pmus__find_core_pmu();
+ struct perf_pmu *pmu;
+
+ /* Metrics aren't currently supported on heterogeneous Arm systems */
+ if (perf_pmus__num_core_pmus() > 1)
+ return NULL;
+ /* Doesn't matter which one here because they'll all be the same */
+ pmu = perf_pmus__find_core_pmu();
if (pmu)
return perf_pmu__find_metrics_table(pmu);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
index cec869cbe163..64e798e68a2d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
@@ -596,17 +596,5 @@ struct perf_pmu *evsel__find_pmu(const struct evsel *evsel)
struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__find_core_pmu(void)
{
- struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
-
- while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(pmu))) {
- /*
- * The cpumap should cover all CPUs. Otherwise, some CPUs may
- * not support some events or have different event IDs.
- */
- if (RC_CHK_ACCESS(pmu->cpus)->nr != cpu__max_cpu().cpu)
- return NULL;
-
- return pmu;
- }
- return NULL;
+ return perf_pmus__scan_core(NULL);
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-13 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-13 15:33 [PATCH v3 0/3] perf: strcmp_cpuid_str() expression fixups James Clark
2023-09-13 15:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] perf pmu: Move pmu__find_core_pmu() to pmus.c James Clark
2023-09-13 16:34 ` Ian Rogers
2023-09-14 6:38 ` John Garry
2023-09-13 15:33 ` James Clark [this message]
2023-09-14 6:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] perf pmus: Simplify perf_pmus__find_core_pmu() John Garry
2023-09-15 11:17 ` James Clark
2023-09-13 15:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] perf pmu: Remove unused function James Clark
2023-09-14 6:41 ` John Garry
2023-09-14 10:39 ` James Clark
2023-09-17 5:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] perf: strcmp_cpuid_str() expression fixups Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230913153355.138331-3-james.clark@arm.com \
--to=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuhaixin.yhx@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®